Mohsen Rezaee, military adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader, told CNN on June 6, 2026, that the release of $24 billion in frozen assets is a critical “trust test” for the Trump administration. He warned that resuming conflict would expand Iranian military operations from the Gulf to the Mediterranean.
The stakes for the current diplomatic deadlock aren’t just financial; they are geographical. Rezaee, a former IRGC commander who led the organization from 1981 to 1997, represents the pragmatic yet hardline security establishment. His rare appearance signals a calculated effort to define Iran’s “red lines” as the world watches the fragile stability of the region.
The $24 Billion Trust Test
At the center of the stalled negotiations is a massive sum of frozen Iranian assets. According to CNN reporting, Rezaee views the return of these funds as the only viable mechanism to build trust between Tehran and Washington.
“If Trump wants to reach an agreement with Iran, this amount of 24 billion dollars is a test of the trust that Iran wishes to conduct with Trump, a test that America must pass, and then the way will be opened for it.”
Mohsen Rezaee, Military Adviser to the Supreme Leader
Rezaee was blunt about the ownership of the funds, stating, “This is our money, not America’s money.” By framing the $24 billion as a prerequisite rather than a result of a deal, Iran is forcing the Trump administration to make the first move. If the funds are released, Rezaee suggests it would create “a new horizon for the future” of bilateral relations.
Expanding the Theater of War
While Rezaee admitted that the “probability of a war breaking out is slim,” his description of a potential escalation was expansive. He warned that if the U.S. resumes the conflict, Iran will not limit its response to the Persian Gulf.
- The Indian Ocean
- The Bab al-Mandab Strait
- The Red Sea
- The Mediterranean
Rezaee explicitly stated that Iran would “add another dimension to the war by attacking other American bases” that have been targeted previously. This threat transforms the conflict from a regional skirmish into a multi-theater maritime war, targeting the very arteries of global trade.
Sovereignty and Maintenance Fees in the Strait of Hormuz
The Strait of Hormuz remains the most volatile variable in the equation. Before the war, this waterway carried one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas. Rezaee asserted that sovereignty over the strait is shared between Iran and Oman, and as such, the two nations will manage it together.
Crucially, Rezaee avoided calling the proposed charges for ships passing through the strait “transit fees.” Instead, he framed them as “maintenance fees,” arguing that Iran should not bear the sole cost of managing the waterway. This linguistic distinction is a strategic move to avoid international legal challenges regarding the freedom of navigation while still extracting revenue from global shipping.
The Lebanon Link: Disrupting the Diplomacy
The tension in the Gulf does not exist in a vacuum. Analysis from Youm7 suggests that the instability in Southern Lebanon is directly tied to the Iran-U.S. negotiation track.
Dr. Said Al-Zoghbi, a professor of political science, argues that Israel is actively working to prevent a rapprochement between Tehran and Washington. According to Al-Zoghbi, Israel is using repeated military violations in Southern Lebanon to provoke Iran and disrupt the diplomatic process.
The Lebanese situation presents a deeper internal crisis. Al-Zoghbi posits that Lebanon’s stability depends on the state reclaiming full sovereignty over the south, which requires a systematic timeline for the Lebanese army to take over weapons currently held by Hezbollah. Without this, he warns, Lebanon remains vulnerable to being dragged into proxy wars that serve external agendas rather than national interests.
The Trump-Khamenei Deadlock
Despite public optimism from the U.S. side, the prospect of a high-level summit appears nonexistent. Donald Trump recently claimed that he and Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei “seem to be on good terms” and expressed that he would be “honored” to meet him.
Rezaee dismissed this possibility entirely. He noted that negotiations are still in their earliest stages and that Trump has already paused the process.
“This will not happen; we are now in the first stage of negotiations, and Mr. Trump has stopped the negotiations. This will not happen.”
Mohsen Rezaee, Military Adviser to the Supreme Leader
This contradiction highlights a significant gap between Trump’s public narrative of personal diplomacy and the reality of the Iranian security state’s requirements. For the Iranians, the “trust” is not personal—it is financial and territorial. Until the $24 billion is returned and the sovereignty of the Strait of Hormuz is acknowledged, the “good terms” mentioned by Trump remain a surface-level projection with no structural foundation.
The next 30 days will likely center on whether the Trump administration views the $24 billion as a price worth paying for regional stability or if the cycle of provocation in Lebanon and the Gulf will push both sides toward the “slim probability” of a wider war.





