Trevor Long

Career overview

Subject: Trevor Long (Acting).
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview.
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided source.
No invented titles, roles, dates, awards, etc.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Plain text only.
Neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Name: Trevor Long.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 16.
Gender: Male.
Content Score: 88.
Source: The Movie Database (TMDB).
The source is extremely sparse. It only provides: Name, Gender (Male), Known For (Acting), Known Credits (16), and Content Score (88).
It does not provide: Film titles, TV show titles, specific roles, birth date, place of birth, awards, or specific years.
Problem: The user wants a 180-260 word career overview.
Constraint Check: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
Conflict: There is almost no information to reach 180 words without inventing facts. If I follow the "ONLY verifiable facts" rule strictly, the text will be very short (maybe 30-40 words).
Strategy: I must attempt to expand on the available facts using neutral, encyclopedic language while strictly adhering to the "no invention" rule. However, if the source doesn't have enough info, I cannot meet the word count without violating the primary instruction.
Drafting attempt 1:
Trevor Long is a male actor. According to The Movie Database, he is known for his work in acting. He has a total of 16 known credits listed in his profile. His content score on the platform is 88.
Word count check: This is about 40 words. The requirement is 180-260.
Re-evaluating the source: Is there anything else? No.
Re-evaluating the instructions: "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess." This is a hard constraint.
The Dilemma: The prompt asks for a specific word count (180-260) but provides a source that can only support about 30 words of factual content.
Decision: As a "meticulous television and film archivist," I cannot invent information to hit a word count. However, usually, in these LLM prompts, if the source is insufficient, the model should prioritize the "verifiable facts" and "omit rather than guess" instruction over the word count instruction, or try to describe the nature of the source information.
Wait, let me look closer at the source text:
"Trevor Long — The Movie Database (TMDB)... Known For Acting... Known Credits 16... Gender Male... Content Score 88..."
If I write:
Trevor Long is an actor whose professional profile is documented on The Movie Database. He is identified as a male performer. His career profile includes 16 known credits. Within the database, he has a content score of 88.
This is still way under 180 words.
Is there any way to expand?
I can mention the platform (TMDB) and the categories listed (Movies, TV Shows, People, Awards, etc.), but those are navigation elements of the website, not facts about Trevor Long's career. The instructions