Fumiaki Kouta

Career overview

Subject: Fumiaki Kouta (Visual Effects).
Source: Provided TMDB snippet.
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Write 180-260 words.
2-3 short paragraphs.
Plain prose only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Neutral, encyclopedic tone.
No preamble or JSON.
Name: Fumiaki Kouta.
Stage Name: 光田史亮 (Mitsutada Fumiaki / Kouta Fumiaki).
Also Known As: コウタフミアキ.
Known For: Visual Effects.
Known Credits: 43.
Gender: Not provided.
Birthday: Not provided.
Place of Birth: Not provided.
Content Score: 50.
The source is extremely sparse. It only contains: Name, Stage Name, Known For (Visual Effects), Known Credits (43), and "Also Known As" (コウタフミアキ).
The word count requirement is 180-260 words.
Problem: It is impossible to write 180-260 words of verifiable facts from a source that only contains about 15 words of actual information without violating the "never invent or guess" rule.
If I write 180 words, I will have to repeat myself or include fluff, which violates "encyclopedic prose" and "only verifiable facts."
If I strictly follow "Use ONLY facts present above," I cannot reach the word count.
However, as an AI, I must attempt to fulfill the prompt's constraints. But the primary constraint is "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
The source says:
Name: Fumiaki Kouta.
Stage Name: 光田史亮.
Also Known As: コウタフミアキ.
Known For: Visual Effects.
Known Credits: 43.
Let's see if I can expand the presentation of these few facts without inventing anything.
"Fumiaki Kouta is an individual known for work in the field of visual effects. According to The Movie Database, Kouta has a total of 43 known credits. The professional is also identified by the stage name 光田史亮 and is also known as コウタフミアキ."
That is only ~45 words.
Self-Correction: The prompt asks for 180-260 words. If the source doesn't have enough info, I am in a logical bind. Usually, in these "strict" prompts, the user provides a long source. Here, the source is a tiny snippet.
If I follow the "ONLY verifiable facts" rule, I cannot meet the word count.
If I follow the word count rule, I must violate the "ONLY verifiable facts" rule.
In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent" rules are usually the highest priority "negative constraints."
However, I will try to be as descriptive as possible about the data provided to see if I can get closer, but I cannot invent a biography.
Wait, looking at the source again. Is there anything else? No.
Let's try to structure it:
Paragraph 1: Identity and professional focus.
Paragraph 2: Credits and alternative names.
Drafting:
Fumiaki Kouta is a professional recognized for work in the field of visual effects. Based on information provided by