Tcherkassy

The scale of the Sunday strikes indicates a significant escalation in the aerial campaign against Ukraine’s capital. According to 98.5 Montréal, the Russian military launched 600 drones and 90 missiles in a coordinated effort to overwhelm Ukrainian defenses. While the Ukrainian Air Force managed to destroy or jam 549 drones and 55 missiles, the remaining volume of fire left the city vulnerable. The aftermath in Kyiv was chaotic. Mayor Vitali Klitschko reported that a school in the Shevchenkivsky district was hit, and another strike near a separate educational facility blocked the entrance to a civilian shelter with debris. The destruction extended to government offices, markets, and residential buildings. Casualty reports vary across sources, reflecting the fog of an active conflict. Radio-Canada reported at least one death and 21 injuries in the capital, with additional casualties in the Dnipro (7) and Tcherkassy (11) regions. However, Le Soleil cited Ukrainian authorities reporting at least 83 injuries in the capital alone, while 98.5 Montréal reported a total of four deaths and over 60 injuries across the country. The intensity of the attack was felt beyond Ukrainian borders. Ferit Hoxha, the Albanian Foreign Minister, confirmed that the residence of the Albanian ambassador in Ukraine was struck during the barrage, calling the incident an unacceptable and grave escalation.

The Orechnik Factor: A New Strategic Threat

The most alarming aspect of Sunday’s offensive was the confirmed use of the Orechnik, a medium-range hypersonic ballistic missile. President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed via Telegram that the weapon struck the city of Bila Tserkva in the Kyiv region, as detailed by Le Soleil. The Orechnik is not merely another tool in the Russian arsenal; it is a high-stakes signal. Capable of carrying both conventional and nuclear warheads, the missile’s deployment represents a shift in the theater of operations. Russia has previously used the Orechnik twice since the 2022 invasion: once in November 2024 against a military plant, and again in January 2026 targeting an aeronautics factory in western Ukraine. The strategic anxiety surrounding the Orechnik is amplified by its deployment in Belarus last year. By positioning these hypersonic assets in a country that borders Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia, Moscow has effectively placed a nuclear-capable, high-speed weapon on the doorstep of three NATO members.

Metric	Launched	Intercepted/Neutralized	Estimated Impact/Missed
Strike Drones	600	549	51
Missiles	90	55	35 (19 missed targets)

Russia’s Retaliation Narrative

The Kremlin has framed this “massive” attack as a necessary response. The Russian Ministry of Defense stated the strikes targeted military command and control facilities, air bases, and defense industry enterprises. This operation was explicitly presented as a riposte to Ukrainian strikes on civilian infrastructure within Russian territory. Specifically, Vladimir Putin pointed to a drone strike on a university residence in eastern Ukraine, an area currently occupied by Russia. Russian authorities claimed that 21 people were killed and 42 injured in that attack, asserting that no military or law enforcement facilities were located near the university. Ukraine has flatly rejected these accusations. During an emergency session of the UN Security Council requested by Russia, Ukrainian Ambassador Andrii Melnyk dismissed the Kremlin’s claims of war crimes as pure propaganda spectacle.

The operations of May 22 exclusively targeted the Russian war machine. Andrii Melnyk, Ukrainian Ambassador to the UN

Warning Signs and Future Risks

The Sunday strike did not come as a total surprise. Both President Zelensky and the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv had issued warnings hours before the missiles began to fall. Zelensky had specifically alerted the population to signs of a combined strike involving various weapon types, including the intermediate-range Orechnik, urging citizens to seek shelter immediately upon hearing alarms. The use of the Orechnik against Bila Tserkva suggests that Russia is becoming more comfortable employing its most advanced ballistic technology against targets closer to the capital. This pattern indicates a willingness to test the limits of Ukrainian air defenses with weapons that are significantly harder to intercept than standard cruise missiles or drones. As the conflict continues, the primary concern for Western allies is the proximity of these assets to the European Union and NATO borders. The transition from using the Orechnik against isolated military factories to employing it in a massive, combined wave against the Kyiv region signals a new phase of aerial warfare where the distinction between military and civilian infrastructure continues to blur.