S8·E3 Short Fuse

Episode recap

Task: Write a 280-380 word episode recap for NCIS Season 8, Episode 3 ("Short Fuse").
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Constraint 2: Do not invent/guess titles, names, dates, counts, awards, ratings, etc.
Constraint 3: If a detail is not in the material, omit it.
Constraint 4: Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose in plain text.
Constraint 5: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Constraint 6: Word count target: 280-380 words.
TMDB Synopsis: "The team investigates a bomb tech's guarded personal life after she is attacked."
Source [1]: General info about NCIS (Crime, Drama, Action & Adventure).
Source [2]: IMDb link (no specific episode info).
Source [3]: Mentions JAG origin, Pauley Perrette as Abby.
Source [4]: Mentions Sean Murray, Brian Dietzen, Rocky Carroll.
Source [5]: General info about NCIS (investigating crimes linked to Navy and Marine Corps personnel).
Episode Title: Short Fuse (from prompt).
Season/Episode: S8E3 (from prompt).
Plot: The team investigates a bomb tech's guarded personal life after she is attacked.
Series Context: NCIS is a crime, drama, and action and adventure series. The team investigates crimes linked to Navy and Marine Corps personnel.
The provided synopsis is extremely sparse: "The team investigates a bomb tech's guarded personal life after she is attacked."
The sources provide general series information but no additional details for this specific episode.
Problem: The user wants a 280-380 word recap, but the provided material only contains one sentence of plot information.
Constraint Check: "If the synopsis is sparse, stay concise rather than guessing." and "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
If I write 280-380 words based only on "The team investigates a bomb tech's guarded personal life after she is attacked," I will be forced to repeat myself or invent details, which violates the primary instruction.
However, I must follow the instruction: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
If I cannot meet the word count without violating the "no guessing/no inventing" rule, I must prioritize the "verifiable facts" rule. But usually, in these prompts, the user expects the word count to be met. Let's see if I can expand using the