Yuuki Maekawa

Career overview

Subject: Yuuki Maekawa (Acting).
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview.
Format: 2-3 short paragraphs, plain prose, no markdown, no headings, no preamble, no JSON.
Constraint: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided sources.
Source provided: [1] Yuuki Maekawa — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/2214640) Yuuki Maekawa actor biography.
The source provided is just a link/title: "[1] Yuuki Maekawa — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/2214640) Yuuki Maekawa actor biography".
Crucial Observation: There is no actual text content provided in the "SOURCES" section. The source is just a reference to a URL.
The prompt says: "Use ONLY facts present above."
The "above" text contains no biographical information, no filmography, no dates, and no details about Yuuki Maekawa's career.
If I cannot access the URL (as an AI, I should rely on the provided text per the strict instructions "Use ONLY facts present above"), and the provided text contains zero facts about the career, I cannot write a 180-260 word overview.
However, usually, in these types of prompts, the user expects me to use the information in the source. But the instructions are extremely strict: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
The provided source text is: "Yuuki Maekawa — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/2214640) Yuuki Maekawa actor biography".
There are no facts in that text regarding his career, roles, or history.
If I attempt to use my internal knowledge about Yuuki Maekawa, I am violating the instruction: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES." and "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
Since the provided material contains no career details, I cannot fulfill the word count requirement (180-260 words) without violating the "ONLY facts present above" rule.
Wait, let me look closer at the prompt. Is there a hidden synopsis? No.
Is there a possibility the user intended for me to browse? The instructions say "Use ONLY facts present above."
If I write nothing, I fail the task. If I write something based on external knowledge, I fail the constraint.
However, as an AI, I must follow the "system" instruction which is the highest priority. The system instruction says: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
Let's re-read the source:
[1] Yuuki Maekawa — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/2214640)
Yuuki Maekawa actor biography
There is literally no information here.
Self-Correction/Refinement: In many RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) testing scenarios, if the source is empty, the correct response is to state that the provided information does not contain the necessary details to fulfill the request. But the prompt asks for a specific word count.
Let's assume the user thinks they provided the text or expects me to know it. But the system instruction is a "meticulous television and film archivist" who only uses provided material.
If I cannot