Momona Naraha

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview of Momona Naraha (Acting).
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Constraint 2: Do not invent titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Constraint 3: If a detail is not in the material, omit it.
Constraint 4: Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose in plain text.
Constraint 5: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Constraint 6: 180-260 words.
Constraint 7: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Source [1]: Momona Naraha — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/3240736) Momona Naraha actor biography.
Wait, the provided source text is just a link and a title. There is no actual biographical text or list of credits provided in the prompt's "SOURCES" section.
The prompt says: "Use ONLY facts present above."
The "above" section contains only: "[1] Momona Naraha — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/3240736) Momona Naraha actor biography".
There are no facts about her career, roles, dates, or films in the provided text.
If I write a career overview based on external knowledge, I violate the "Use ONLY facts present above" and "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess" rules.
If I write nothing, I fail the task of writing 180-260 words.
However, as an archivist following strict instructions, if the source material contains zero facts, I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the core instruction to only use provided facts.
Self-Correction/Refinement: Let me look closer at the prompt. Is there a hidden synopsis? No.
Is there a possibility the user intended to provide text but forgot? Yes.
As an AI, if I am told to write 180-260 words using only the provided facts, and there are no facts provided, I am in a logical deadlock.
Wait, let me check if the prompt implies I should access the URL. The instructions say: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES." It does not say "Go to this URL and read it." Usually, in these RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) tasks, the text is provided in the prompt.
Let's look at the source again:
[1] Momona Naraha — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/3240736)
Momona Naraha actor biography
There is literally no information here other than her name and that she has an actor biography on TMDB.
If I follow the instructions "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess" and "Use ONLY facts present above", I cannot write a 180-260 word career overview.
However, sometimes in these specific prompt engineering tests, the "source" is meant to be the text provided. If the text provided is empty of facts, the only honest response is to state that the provided source contains no biographical information to summarize. But the prompt asks for a specific word count and format.
Let's re-read: "Use ONLY facts present above."
If I cannot fulfill the word count without violating the "ONLY facts" rule, I must prioritize the "ONLY facts" rule as it is