Minako Tanaka

Career overview

Subject: Minako Tanaka (Acting).
Source provided: [1] Minako Tanaka — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1015991) Minako Tanaka actor biography.
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Constraint 2: Do not invent/guess titles, names, dates, etc.
Constraint 3: Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose in plain text.
Constraint 4: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Constraint 5: Length: 180-260 words.
Constraint 6: Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Constraint 7: No preamble, no JSON.
Source [1] is just a link and a title: "Minako Tanaka — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1015991) Minako Tanaka actor biography".
Crucial realization: The prompt provides the link but does not provide the text of the biography within the prompt itself. However, as an AI, I must check if the "provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES" contains the actual content.
Looking at the prompt: "SOURCES: [1] Minako Tanaka — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1015991) Minako Tanaka actor biography".
There is no text content provided under the source. The source is just a URL and a title.
Strict adherence to instructions: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
If the source text is not provided, I have zero facts to work with.
Wait, if I cannot access the internet to browse the link (per standard safety/tooling protocols unless specified, but here I am acting as an archivist with provided sources), and the prompt says "Use ONLY facts present above", and there are no facts "above" other than the name "Minako Tanaka", I cannot write a 180-260 word career overview.
Let me re-read the prompt. Is there hidden text? No.
Is the user expecting me to know who Minako Tanaka is from my training data? The instructions say: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I use my training data, I am violating the instruction "Use ONLY facts present above".
If I write nothing, I fail the length requirement.
However, the instruction "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess" is the primary directive for an archivist.
Let's look at the source again.
[1] Minako Tanaka — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1015991) Minako Tanaka actor biography.
There is no information about her roles, dates, or career in the provided text.
Self-Correction/Refinement: In many LLM testing scenarios, the "Source" is meant to be the text provided. If the text provided is empty of content, I cannot fulfill the request to write 180-260 words without violating the "ONLY facts present above" rule.
Wait, is it possible the user intended for me to use the link? The prompt says "Use ONLY facts present above." The link is "above". But a link is not a fact; it's a pointer. The content of the link is not "above".
Let's assume