Mary Sue Evans

Career overview

Subject: Mary Sue Evans (Acting).
Source: Provided TMDB snippet.
Constraints:
Write ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble or JSON.
Name: Mary Sue Evans.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 7.
Gender: Female.
Content Score: 50.
Birthday/Place of Birth: Not provided.
The source is extremely sparse. It only says she is an actress with 7 known credits and a content score of 50.
The prompt requires 180-260 words.
Problem: There are not enough facts in the source to reach 180 words without inventing information or repeating the same sentence multiple times.
Constraint Check: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I follow the "omit rather than guess" rule, I cannot reach the 180-word minimum.
If I follow the "180-260 word" rule, I must invent information.
In strict instruction following for an archivist persona, the "verifiable facts" and "never invent" rules are the primary directives. However, usually, in these LLM prompts, the word count is a target.
Let's look at the source again.
Name: Mary Sue Evans.
Profession: Acting.
Credits: 7.
Gender: Female.
Content Score: 50.
Wait, if I write: "Mary Sue Evans is a female actress. She has 7 known credits. Her content score is 50." That is about 20 words.
I cannot fulfill the 180-260 word requirement using only the provided facts without violating the "never invent" rule.
Self-Correction/Strategy: I will write everything available in a professional, encyclopedic manner. If I cannot reach the word count, I must prioritize the "never invent" and "only verifiable facts" instruction, as that is the core of the persona. However, I will try to expand the prose stylistically (e.g., "The individual known as Mary Sue Evans is documented as...") to see if I can get closer, but I cannot add facts.
Actually, looking at the prompt again: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
This is a contradictory prompt if the source is too short.
Let's see if I can expand the description of the facts without adding new facts.
"Mary Sue Evans is a female professional known for her work in acting. According to the records provided by The Movie Database, she has a total of seven known credits. Her profile on the platform indicates a content score of 50."
This is still very short.
Let's re-read the source. Is there anything else?
"Known For: Acting"
"Known Credits: 7"
"Gender: Female"
"Content Score: 50"
"TMDB"
If I strictly follow "Write ONLY verifiable facts... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess," I cannot meet the