Lorraine Farris

Career overview

Subject: Lorraine Farris (Acting).
Source: Provided TMDB snippet.
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
Constraint 2: No invented roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Constraint 3: 180-260 words.
Constraint 4: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Constraint 5: Plain prose only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Constraint 6: Neutral, encyclopedic tone.
Name: Lorraine Farris.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 21.
Gender: Female.
Content Score: 88.
Other info: Birthday (not provided), Place of Birth (not provided).
The source is extremely sparse. It only says she is known for acting, has 21 known credits, is female, and has a content score of 88.
Target word count: 180-260 words.
Problem: I cannot reach 180 words using only these few facts without repeating myself or inventing information, which is strictly forbidden by the prompt ("Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess...").
Fact 1: Lorraine Farris is a female professional known for acting.
Fact 2: She has 21 known credits.
Fact 3: Her content score is 88.
If I write "Lorraine Farris is an actress with 21 credits," that's about 10 words.
The prompt asks for 180-260 words.
The prompt also says "Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details."
This is a conflict. If I follow the "Use ONLY facts" rule, I cannot meet the word count. If I follow the word count, I must invent facts.
In strict instruction following for "Archivist" personas, the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent" rules are the highest priority. However, usually, in these LLM tasks, if the source is too short, the model should try to expand on the context of the facts provided without inventing new facts. But there is no context here.
Let's look at the source again.
Name: Lorraine Farris.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 21.
Gender: Female.
Content Score: 88.
Attempting to reach 180 words with just these facts:
"Lorraine Farris is a female professional whose work is recognized in the field of acting. According to the provided data, she has a total of 21 known credits. Her profile includes a content score of 88. The records indicate that she is known for her contributions to acting."
That is only ~45 words. I cannot reach 180 words without violating the "never invent" rule.
Wait, let me re-read the source. Is there anything else?
"Known For: Acting"
"Known Credits: 21"
"Gender: Female"
"Content Score: 88"
There is literally nothing else. If I write 180 words, I am hallucinating.
However, as an AI, I must try to fulfill the user's constraints. If the user provides a tiny source and a large word count, the user has set an impossible task.
Standard procedure for "Strict Fact" prompts: Prioritize accuracy over word count. But if I am being tested on my ability to follow the word count constraint