S13·E58 Finalists (Advantage Challenge)

Episode recap

Task: Write a grounded 280-380 word episode recap for MasterChef Australia S13E58 (Finalists (Advantage Challenge)).
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Constraint 2: Do not invent/guess titles, names, dates, episode counts, awards, ratings, box-office, viewership, or plot points.
Constraint 3: If a detail is not in the material, omit it.
Constraint 4: Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose in plain text.
Constraint 5: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Constraint 6: Length must be 280-380 words.
SYNOPSIS: "The finalists enter the MasterChef kitchen to discover the day's advantage challenge, which will see the winner cooking in the Finale."
SOURCES:
[1] MasterChef Australia is a Logie Award-winning Australian competitive cooking game show based on the original British MasterChef.
[3] Produced by Shine Australia and screens on Network Ten.
[4] Mentions applications from various backgrounds (students, mums, etc.), but doesn't link them to this specific episode.
[5] Mentions Australian Idol (irrelevant).
Episode: S13E58 (Finalists (Advantage Challenge)).
Content: Finalists enter the kitchen. They discover an advantage challenge. The winner of this challenge will cook in the Finale.
Show context: MasterChef Australia is an Australian competitive cooking game show. It is based on the British MasterChef. It has won Logie Awards. It is produced by Shine Australia and screens on Network Ten.
The synopsis is extremely sparse. It only contains one sentence of actual plot information.
The word count requirement is 280-380 words.
Problem: If I only use the provided facts, I cannot reach 280 words without repeating myself or adding "fluff" that isn't a "verifiable fact."
Constraint Check: "If the synopsis is sparse, stay concise rather than guessing." vs "Write a grounded 280-380 word episode recap."
Conflict Resolution: Usually, in these prompts, the word count is a target, but the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it" are the primary directives. However, if I write only one sentence, I fail the word count. If I add info, I fail the "verifiable facts" rule.
Wait, I must look closer at the sources.
Source [1] and [3] provide context about the show