S1·E12 I Can See You

Episode recap

Task: Write a 280-380 word episode recap for Chicago Typewriter S1E12 (I Can See You).
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Constraint 2: No invented titles, names, dates, counts, awards, ratings, etc.
Constraint 3: No guessing or inventing plot points.
Constraint 4: Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose in plain text.
Constraint 5: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Constraint 6: Word count target: 280-380 words.
Synopsis: Seol and Se-joo decide not to play games with their relationship and be honest about their feelings. Se-joo suggests Seol write a novel with him and Ji-no. Seol meets Ji-no and remembers things from the past. Tae-min meets Jo Sang-mi and asks what she wants to do with Se-joo.
Sources:
Series Title: Chicago Typewriter.
Year: 2017.
Country: South Korea.
Cast: Yoo Ah-in, Im Soo-jung, Go Kyung-pyo, Kwak Si-yang.
Premise: Writers from 1930s Japanese rule reincarnated as a bestselling writer in a slump, a mysterious ghostwriter, and a devoted fan/anti-fan.
Format: 16 episodes.
Aired: April to June 2017 on tvN.
The synopsis is very short.
The sources provide context about the series but not much about the specific episode's plot beyond the synopsis.
Problem: The synopsis is only about 50 words. The target word count is 280-380 words.
Constraint Check: "If the synopsis is sparse, stay concise rather than guessing."
Conflict: The user asks for 280-380 words, but the instructions say "If the synopsis is sparse, stay concise rather than guessing." and "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
If I write 280 words based on a 50-word synopsis without inventing anything, I will fail the "no inventing" rule. If I follow the "stay concise" rule, I will fail the "280-380 word" rule.
Resolution: In professional archiving/reference writing, accuracy and adherence to source material take precedence over arbitrary word counts if the source material is insufficient. However, I should try to incorporate the series context provided in the sources to flesh out the entry while remaining strictly factual.
*