S2·E41 The Last Stroke

Episode recap

In this episode, a painter is discovered dead inside his own art gallery while he is in the midst of creating a new work. The scene is quiet, the canvas unfinished, and the atmosphere is heavy with the mystery of a sudden, violent end. The CID team is called to the gallery to begin a forensic examination of the premises and to piece together the circumstances that led to the artist’s demise.

The investigators first secure the area and note the position of the body, the surrounding artworks, and any items that may have been disturbed. Among the evidence collected is a distinctive lipstick mark left on a cup placed near the workbench. The presence of the mark suggests that someone who wore lipstick had been in close proximity to the victim shortly before the fatal incident.

Further scrutiny of the gallery reveals a personal diary lying on a nearby table. The diary contains handwritten entries that may provide insight into the painter’s recent thoughts, relationships, or possible threats. The team carefully photographs the pages, preserving the content for later analysis while ensuring the integrity of the evidence.

A single photograph is also found within the gallery. The image captures a moment that could be linked to the painter’s social circle or professional engagements, offering a visual clue that may identify individuals connected to the case. The investigators treat the photograph as a potential lead, examining the background details for recognizable faces or locations.

Lastly, a mobile phone is recovered from the scene. The device is examined for recent calls, messages, and contacts that could reveal communications with persons of interest. The CID team extracts data from the phone, looking for any correspondence that might indicate motive, alibi, or a direct threat.

Throughout the episode, the investigators methodically analyze each clue—the lipstick mark, the diary, the photograph, and the mobile phone—cross‑referencing the information to construct a timeline and to narrow down possible suspects. The narrative builds tension as the team works to determine whether these disparate pieces of evidence will converge to identify the killer responsible for the painter’s untimely death.