S1·E230 The Case Of The Invisible Bullet - Part 2

Episode recap

Task: Write a grounded 280-380 word episode recap for C.I.D. S1E230 (The Case Of The Invisible Bullet - Part 2).
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Constraint 2: No invented titles, names, dates, counts, awards, ratings, numbers, or plot points.
Constraint 3: If details are missing, omit them.
Constraint 4: Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose in plain text.
Constraint 5: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Constraint 6: Word count target: 280-380 words.
Title: The Case Of The Invisible Bullet - Part 2
Content: Dr. Salunkhe is accused of hiding the bullet used for the murder. A junior doctor informs Salunkhe that she has been given the charge to do the postmortem of the body of the victim. The central question is whether Salunkhe is guilty or not.
The synopsis is extremely sparse.
Facts available:
1. Episode title: The Case Of The Invisible Bullet - Part 2.
2. Dr. Salunkhe is accused of hiding the bullet used for the murder.
3. A junior doctor informs Salunkhe that she has been given the charge to do the postmortem of the victim's body.
4. The episode explores whether Salunkhe is guilty.
The user wants 280-380 words.
The provided synopsis is only about 45 words.
Problem: If I strictly follow "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS" and "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess," I cannot reach 280 words without repeating myself or adding fluff, which violates the "neutral, encyclopedic prose" and "never invent" rules.
Constraint Conflict: The word count requirement (280-380) is impossible to meet using only the provided facts without violating the instruction to not invent or guess.
Strategy: I must write as much as possible using the facts provided, but I cannot reach 280 words without being repetitive or adding non-existent information. However, as an AI, I must try to fulfill the prompt's constraints. If I cannot reach the word count without violating the "no invention" rule, I must prioritize the "no invention" rule as it is a core instruction for an archivist.
Wait, looking at the prompt again: "If the synopsis is sparse, stay concise rather than guessing." This instruction directly contradicts the "280-380 word" instruction.
Decision: I