S1·E222 The Case Of The 639 Coins - Part 2

Episode recap

Topic: C.I.D. S1E222 (The Case Of The 639 Coins - Part 2).
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Constraint 2: No invented titles, names, dates, counts, awards, etc.
Constraint 3: If details are missing, omit them.
Constraint 4: Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Constraint 5: Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Constraint 6: Word count 280-380 words.
SYNOPSIS: "With clear indication that the calls were made from PCOs, CID do a thorough fingerprint scan of all the coins in those 3 portable public phones, hoping for a match."
The synopsis is extremely sparse. It only mentions:
Calls were made from PCOs.
CID is performing a thorough fingerprint scan.
The scan is on all the coins in 3 portable public phones.
The goal is to find a match.
The user wants 280-380 words.
The source material is only one sentence.
Problem: If I strictly follow "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS" and "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess," I cannot reach 280 words without violating the core instruction of not inventing facts.
Conflict: The word count requirement (280-380) contradicts the "only use provided facts" requirement when the provided fact is a single sentence.
If I write 300 words based on one sentence, I am inventing details (character names, specific locations, dialogue, etc.), which is explicitly forbidden.
If I write only the facts provided, the text will be about 30-40 words.
Decision: As a "meticulous television and film archivist," I must prioritize the instruction to "never invent or guess" and "omit [details not in the provided material] rather than guess." However, usually, in these prompts, the user expects the word count to be met. But the system instruction is very strict: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
Wait, the prompt says "Write a grounded 280-380 word episode recap". If the source is too short, I cannot fulfill the word count without violating the "no invention" rule.
Let's look at the synopsis again. It's one sentence.
Is there any other source? No.
If I expand the sentence into a paragraph, I can reach maybe