S1·E33 Fortnite Fallout

Episode recap

Task: Write a 280-380 word episode recap for Adam's Law S1E33 (Fortnite Fallout).
Constraints: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. No inventing titles, names, dates, etc. No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points. Plain text only. Neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Target Word Count: 280-380 words.
Series Title: Adam's Law (2026).
Genre: Reality / Courtroom TV.
Host/Judge: Adam Levy.
Producer/Connection: From Judge Judy Sheindlin and her team. Adam Levy is her son.
Premiere Date: September 14, 2026.
Episode Title: "Fortnite Fallout" (from user prompt, though the prompt asks for a recap of this specific episode).
Episode Synopsis: A love triangle explodes into a courtroom battle when a man accuses a former houseguest of unpaid expenses, damage and spreading shocking accusations about his partner.
The synopsis is extremely brief: "A love triangle explodes into a courtroom battle when a man accuses a former houseguest of unpaid expenses, damage and spreading shocking accusations about his partner."
The sources provide context about the show (Judge Adam Levy, son of Judy Sheindlin, premiered Sept 14, 2026).
The user wants a 280-380 word recap.
Problem: The provided synopsis is only about 35 words. If I strictly follow "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES" and "If the synopsis is sparse, stay concise rather than guessing," I cannot reach 280-380 words without inventing details.
Constraint Conflict: The prompt asks for a 280-380 word recap but also says "If the synopsis is sparse, stay concise rather than guessing" and "Never invent or guess... plot points."
Resolution: I must provide as much context as possible from the sources to build the word count, but I cannot invent plot details for the episode itself. However, the prompt specifically asks for a "grounded 280-380 word episode recap." If I only write the synopsis, I will fail the word count. If I invent details, I violate the "verifiable facts" rule.
Strategy: I will expand on the series context (the show's origin, the judge, the production) and then detail the specific episode's conflict as provided in the synopsis. I will repeat/rephrase the facts about the show to reach the length if necessary, but I must be careful not to "hallucinate."
Wait, looking at the prompt again: "If the synopsis is