Tatum Langton

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a career overview of Tatum Langton (Acting).
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Do not invent/guess titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
If detail is not in the material, omit it.
Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose in plain text.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble, no JSON.
Source [1]: Tatum Langton — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1168254) Tatum Langton actor biography.
Wait, the provided source is just a link/title. There is no actual text content provided in the prompt under "SOURCES" other than the link description.
The prompt says: "Use ONLY facts present above."
The "above" section contains: "[1] Tatum Langton — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1168254) Tatum Langton actor biography".
There is no synopsis or biographical text provided in the prompt.
If I follow the instructions strictly ("You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES"), and the provided source contains zero facts about her career (only her name and a link), I cannot write a 180-260 word career overview.
However, usually, in these types of prompts, the user intended to provide text but didn't, or expects me to know the content of the link (which I shouldn't do if I'm being a "meticulous archivist" following "ONLY facts present above").
Actually, looking at the prompt again: "Use ONLY facts present above."
If the source text is empty of biographical details, I have nothing to write.
Self-Correction: I must check if there's any hidden text. No.
Hypothesis: The user might have forgotten to paste the biography.
Alternative: Is the link itself the source? I am an AI, I can't "browse" the live link in real-time to extract text if it's not provided in the context window, although I have training data. But the instruction says "explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES".
Let's look at the prompt again. "SOURCES: [1] Tatum Langton — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1168254) Tatum Langton actor biography".
There is no text.
If I write a biography based on my internal knowledge, I am violating the instruction: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES." and "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
Since there is no information provided in the source text to build a 180-260 word career overview, I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the core constraint of only using provided facts.
Wait, let me re-read. Is there any chance the user thinks the link is the source and I should use my knowledge? The instructions are very strict: "Use ONLY facts present above."
If I provide an empty response, it's unhelpful. If I provide a biography from my training data, I violate the "ONLY facts present above" rule.
Let's assume the user meant for me to use the information that would be at that link, but as an AI