Susan Deming

Career overview

Subject: Susan Deming (Acting).
Source: Provided TMDB snippet.
Constraints:
Only verifiable facts from the source.
No invented details (roles, dates, awards, etc.).
Length: 180-260 words.
Format: 2-3 short paragraphs, plain prose, no markdown, no headings, no preamble, no JSON.
Tone: Neutral, encyclopedic, meticulous archivist.
Name: Susan Deming.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 9.
Gender: Female.
Content Score: 88.
Other info: No birthday, no place of birth, no specific movie/TV titles listed in the snippet.
The source is extremely sparse. It only says she is an actress with 9 known credits and a content score of 88.
The user wants 180-260 words.
Problem: There is almost no information to reach 180 words without inventing details.
Constraint Check: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I strictly follow the instruction to only use provided facts, I cannot reach 180 words.
The source contains:
1. Name: Susan Deming.
2. Profession: Acting.
3. Total known credits: 9.
4. Gender: Female.
5. Content score: 88.
Wait, if I write only these facts, the text will be about 30 words.
The prompt asks for 180-260 words.
Usually, in these LLM tasks, if the source is insufficient to meet the length requirement, I must prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent" instructions over the length instruction. However, I should try to expand the prose as much as possible using the limited facts provided without violating the "no invention" rule.
Drafting attempt 1 (Strict adherence to facts):
Susan Deming is a female professional known for her work in acting. According to The Movie Database, she has nine known credits in the industry. Her profile on the platform includes a content score of 88.
Critique 1: This is about 35 words. I cannot reach 180 words without inventing information.
Re-reading instructions: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details."
This is a conflict. If I follow "Use ONLY facts" and "Do not invent," I cannot meet "180-260 words."
In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, the "Negative Constraints" (Do not invent, Use ONLY facts) usually take precedence over "Length Constraints" because length constraints are often targets, whereas "Do not invent" is a hard rule for accuracy.
Let's see if there's anything else.
Gender: Female.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 9.
Content Score: 88.
I will write the most professional, encyclopedic version of these facts. I will acknowledge the source (TMDB) as provided.
Drafting attempt 2:
Susan Deming is an individual identified within The Movie Database as being known for her work in acting. Her professional profile indicates that she is female.

Based on the available data from the source, Deming has a total of nine known credits. The database assigns her a content score of 88.
Word count check: ~5