Sunil Pandey

Career overview

Subject: Sunil Pandey (Directing).
Source: TMDB profile provided.
Constraint 1: Write ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
Constraint 2: No inventing titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Constraint 3: 180-260 words.
Constraint 4: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Constraint 5: Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Constraint 6: Neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Name: Sunil Pandey.
Known For: Directing.
Known Credits: 4.
Content Score: 50.
Gender: Not provided (-).
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Also Known As: Not provided (-).
The source is extremely sparse. It only says he is known for directing and has 4 known credits. It also mentions a content score of 50.
I need to reach 180-260 words using only these facts.
Problem: There are almost no facts. If I strictly follow "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES," and the source only contains "Sunil Pandey," "Directing," and "4 credits," I cannot reach 180 words without repeating myself or adding fluff that isn't a "verifiable fact."
Wait: The prompt says "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
If the facts are: Name is Sunil Pandey, known for directing, has 4 known credits, content score is 50.
How can I write 180 words about a person with 4 credits and no other info?
If I follow the "No inventing" rule, I cannot say "He is a talented director" or "He has worked in many industries."
Let's look at the source again.
Name: Sunil Pandey.
Known For: Directing.
Known Credits: 4.
Content Score: 50.
Everything else is a dash or "Still needs a little work."
Self-Correction: As an archivist, if the source is empty, I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the "Do not invent" rule. However, usually in these prompts, the user expects the AI to expand on the context of the data provided. But the instruction is very strict: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported... You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
Let's try to construct what I can:
Sunil Pandey is a professional known for directing. According to the records on The Movie Database, he has four known credits in this capacity. His profile currently shows a content score of 50.
That is about 35 words. I need 180-260.
If I repeat the same thing, it's bad writing. If I add "He is a filmmaker," that's an inference (though "Directing" implies it).
Is there any other info? No.
Let's re-read the source.
"Known For: Directing"
"Known Credits: 4"
"Content Score: 50"
If I cannot meet the word count without inventing facts, I have a conflict in instructions.
Instruction A: Write 180-260 words.
Instruction B: Write ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
Instruction C: Do not invent or guess.

*