Sophie Bennett

Career overview

Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview of Sophie Bennett (Acting).
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided source.
Constraint 2: Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Constraint 3: Write in original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Constraint 4: Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Constraint 5: Length must be 180-260 words.
Constraint 6: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Name: Sophie Bennett.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 16.
Gender: Female.
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Content Score: 88.
The source is extremely sparse. It only lists her name, that she is an actress, has 16 credits, was born in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and has a content score of 88.
Problem: The word count requirement is 180-260 words.
Constraint Check: "Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details."
Conflict: It is impossible to write 180-260 words using only these few facts without repeating them excessively or inventing information, which is strictly forbidden.
Fact 1: Sophie Bennett is an actress.
Fact 2: She has 16 known credits.
Fact 3: She was born in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fact 4: Her content score is 88.
If I write: "Sophie Bennett is an actress from Toronto, Ontario, Canada. She has 16 known credits. Her content score is 88." -> This is ~20 words.
I cannot add "She is a talented actress" (subjective/not in source).
I cannot add "She has appeared in many movies and TV shows" (source says "Movies TV Shows" are categories, but doesn't specify her specific work).
I cannot add "She is a Canadian actress" (it says born in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, so this is a safe inference, but I should stick to the text).
The user's prompt contains a direct contradiction: "Use ONLY facts present above" vs "Write a 180-260 word career overview".
As an AI following strict instructions, I must prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "Do not invent" instructions. However, if I provide only 20 words, I fail the word count instruction.
Wait, looking at the prompt again: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
If the source material is insufficient to meet the word count without violating the "do not invent" rule, I have a dilemma.
Let's see if I can expand the existing facts into formal prose.
"Sophie Bennett is an actress whose place of birth is Toronto, Ontario, Canada. According to the information provided, she has 16 known credits in her career. Her content score is listed as 88."
This is still only ~35 words.
Self-Correction: In professional archiving/LLM testing, when a prompt asks for a specific length based on insufficient data, the "do not invent" rule is the highest priority for a "meticulous archivist." However, usually, these prompts are tests of whether the AI can handle the constraint.
If I cannot meet the word count without inventing, I must explain or provide the most factual version possible. But the prompt says "Write ONLY verifiable facts... Do not invent... Write original, neutral