Shotaro Okubo

Career overview

Subject: Shotaro Okubo (Acting).
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview.
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided source.
No invented roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Format: Plain text, no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points, no preamble, no JSON.
Style: Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Name: Shotaro Okubo.
Also Known As: 大久保祥太郎 Ookubo Shoutarou.
Gender: Male.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 9.
Content Score: 50.
Birthday/Place of Birth: Not provided.
The source is extremely sparse. It only lists his name, gender, that he is known for acting, and that he has 9 known credits.
The word count requirement is 180-260 words.
Problem: It is impossible to write 180-260 words of verifiable facts from a source that only contains about 15-20 words of information without inventing details or repeating the same sentence dozens of times.
If I follow the instruction "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES" and "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess," I cannot meet the word count requirement of 180-260 words.
However, as an AI, I must try to fulfill the prompt's constraints. If the source is insufficient to reach the word count, I have a conflict between "Use ONLY facts present" and "Write a 180-260 word career overview."
Usually, in these "archivist" prompts, the word count is a target, but the "ONLY facts" rule is the primary directive. If I invent facts to hit the word count, I violate the core instruction.
Let's see what I can say:
Shotaro Okubo is a male actor. He is also known as Ookubo Shoutarou or 大久保祥太郎. According to The Movie Database, he has nine known credits in the industry. His content score is listed at 50.
That is only about 40 words. I cannot reach 180 words without violating the "Do not invent" rule.
Wait, let me look closer at the source.
"Known For: Acting"
"Known Credits: 9"
"Also Known As: 大久保祥太郎 Ookubo Shoutarou"
"Gender: Male"
"Content Score: 50"
There is literally nothing else. No movies, no shows, no years, no awards.
If I write: "Shotaro Okubo is a male actor. He is also known as Ookubo Shoutarou or 大久保祥太郎. He has nine known credits. His content score is 50."
This is the only way to be truthful to the source.
Self-Correction: If the user provides a source that is too short to meet the word count, and explicitly forbids inventing facts, the correct professional response for an archivist is to provide the facts available. However, if I provide only 40 words, I fail the word count constraint.
Let's try to expand the prose stylistically without adding new facts.
"Shotaro Okubo is a male individual recognized for his work in acting. His professional profile includes nine known credits. He is also identified by the names Ookubo Shoutarou and 大久保祥太郎. On The