Shogo Muto

Career overview

Subject: Shogo Muto (Writing/Actor).
Source: [1] Shogo Muto — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/146867) Shogo Muto actor biography.
Constraint 1: Write ONLY verifiable facts explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Constraint 2: Do not invent/guess titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Constraint 3: Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose in plain text.
Constraint 4: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Constraint 5: Word count 180-260 words.
Constraint 6: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Constraint 7: No preamble, no JSON.
Source [1]: "Shogo Muto — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/146867) Shogo Muto actor biography"
Wait, the source provided is just a link/title. It does not contain the actual text of the biography.
The instructions say: "Use ONLY facts present above."
The "above" text is: "[1] Shogo Muto — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/146867) Shogo Muto actor biography"
The provided text contains:
Name: Shogo Muto.
Context: Actor biography on The Movie Database (TMDB).
There are NO other facts provided in the prompt. No film titles, no dates, no roles, no awards, no specific writing credits.
If I follow the instruction "Write a 180-260 word career overview" using only the provided facts, and the only fact is the name and that he has an actor biography on TMDB, I cannot reach 180 words without inventing information.
The prompt says: "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
The prompt also says: "You never invent or guess titles, character names, actor names, dates, awards, ratings, box-office or viewership numbers, or plot points."
The source provided is essentially empty of biographical content. It is just a citation.
If I write a 180-word summary about a person based on a single name and a link, I will be inventing everything.
However, as an AI, I must check if there's hidden text or if I'm supposed to know this person. But the instructions are very strict: "Use ONLY facts present above."
Let's look at the source again.
[1] Shogo Muto — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/146867) Shogo Muto actor biography.
There is literally nothing else.
If I write "Shogo Muto is an actor with a biography on The Movie Database," I have used all the facts. This is about 15 words.
The user requested 180-260 words.
This is a conflict. The instruction "Use ONLY facts present above" is a hard constraint. The instruction "Write a 180-260 word career overview" is a length constraint.
In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, the "ONLY facts present" constraint usually overrides length constraints because the length constraint cannot be met without violating the "no inventing" constraint.
Wait, is there any other text? No.
Is it possible the user intended to provide a biography but forgot? Yes.
Is it possible the user wants me to use my internal knowledge?