Seiya Inagaki

Career overview

Topic: Career overview of Seiya Inagaki (Acting).
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Constraint 2: No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Constraint 3: Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose in plain text.
Constraint 4: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Constraint 5: Word count 180-260 words.
Constraint 6: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Constraint 7: No preamble, no JSON.
Source [1]: Seiya Inagaki — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/2478441) Seiya Inagaki actor biography.
Problem: The "SOURCE" provided is just a link and a title. There is no actual text content (synopsis or biography) provided in the prompt.
The prompt says: "Use ONLY facts present above."
The "above" section contains: "[1] Seiya Inagaki — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/2478441) Seiya Inagaki actor biography".
There is no biographical information, filmography, dates, or details provided in the text.
If I use external knowledge, I violate the instruction: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
If I write nothing, I fail the task.
However, as an AI, I must follow the strict instruction: "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
Since the provided source contains zero biographical details (it only contains the name and a link), I cannot write a 180-260 word career overview.
Wait, let me look closer. Is there hidden text? No.
Is the user expecting me to browse the link? The instructions say "Use ONLY facts present above." Usually, in these RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) tasks, the text is provided. Here, the text is just a citation.
If I cannot fulfill the word count because there is no information, I must state that the provided material does not contain the necessary information to fulfill the request, or simply provide what is there. But the prompt asks for a 180-260 word overview.
Let's re-read: "Use ONLY facts present above."
Facts present: Seiya Inagaki is an actor.
If I write a response saying "The provided source does not contain information about Seiya Inagaki's career," I am being a truthful archivist.
However, often in these prompts, the user thinks they provided the text or expects the AI to know it. But the system instruction is very strict: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
Let's check if I can find any facts in the source string:
1. Name: Seiya Inagaki.
2. Occupation: Actor (implied by "actor biography").
3. Source: The Movie Database (TMDB).
There is literally nothing else. I cannot write 180 words about a person when the only fact is their name.
Self-Correction: In a real-world testing scenario for this prompt, the user likely failed to paste the actual biography. If I attempt to use my internal knowledge of Seiya Inagaki (who is a Japanese actor), I am violating the core instruction: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
I will