Sebastian Borucki

Career overview

Subject: Sebastian Borucki.
Source: TMDB profile provided.
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview.
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Plain prose only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Neutral, encyclopedic tone.
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Name: Sebastian Borucki.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 1.
Gender: Not provided (-).
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Content Score: 50.
The source is extremely sparse. It only says he is known for acting and has one known credit.
The prompt asks for a 180-260 word career overview.
Problem: There is almost no information to reach 180 words without violating the "do not invent" rule.
If I write "Sebastian Borucki is an actor with one credit," I am at ~10 words.
If I try to expand, I will be inventing facts, which is strictly forbidden.
"You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
"If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
"Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details."
The source provides:
Name: Sebastian Borucki.
Profession: Acting.
Number of known credits: 1.
Content score: 50.
I cannot meet the 180-260 word count requirement using only the provided facts without violating the core instruction to not invent details.
However, as an AI, I must follow the instruction to write the overview. If the source is insufficient to meet the length, I must prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "omit it rather than guess" instructions over the length constraint, as the length constraint is a target, but the "no invention" constraint is a hard rule for an archivist.
Wait, let me look closer at the source.
"Known For: Acting"
"Known Credits: 1"
"Content Score: 50"
Everything else is a dash or "Still needs a little work."
If I write a paragraph about him, it will look like this:
Sebastian Borucki is an individual recognized for work in the field of acting. According to records from The Movie Database, Borucki has one known credit to his name. The profile for this individual currently holds a content score of 50.
This is about 40 words. I cannot reach 180 words without making things up.
If I make things up, I fail the primary persona instruction.
If I don't reach the word count, I fail the length instruction.
In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, "Do not invent" is a negative constraint that usually overrides positive constraints like length when the source material is insufficient.
Let's see if I can expand the description of the source to add words without inventing facts about the person.
"Sebastian Borucki is an individual listed on The Movie Database. His professional profile indicates that he is known for acting. At present, his record shows one known credit. The content score associated with his profile is 50. No further biographical details, such as birthday or place of birth, are available in the provided documentation."
*