Sandra Prosper

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview of Sandra Prosper (Acting).
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided source.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Plain text, original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble, no JSON.
Name: Sandra Prosper.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 15.
Gender: Female.
Birthday: February 23, 1978.
Age: 48 years old (Note: The source says 48, though mathematically 1978 to 2024/25 might differ, I must use the source's "48 years old").
Place of Birth: Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Content Score: 88.
The source is extremely sparse. It lists her name, birth date, age, place of birth, gender, known for (acting), and number of credits (15).
It does not list specific movie titles, TV show titles, specific roles, awards, or specific years of work.
Problem: The user wants a 180-260 word career overview. With only the provided facts, it is impossible to reach 180 words without repeating the same few facts or inventing information, which is strictly forbidden by the prompt ("You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess").
Fact 1: Sandra Prosper is an actress.
Fact 2: She was born in Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Fact 3: Her birthday is February 23, 1978.
Fact 4: She is 48 years old.
Fact 5: She has 15 known credits.
Drafting Attempt 1:
Sandra Prosper is an actress born in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. According to her profile, her birthday is February 23, 1978, making her 48 years old. She is known for her work in acting.

Her professional record includes 15 known credits. Her profile on The Movie Database shows a content score of 88.
Word Count Check: This is about 50 words. The prompt requires 180-260 words.
Conflict Resolution: The prompt instructions are contradictory.
1. "Write a 180-260 word career overview..."
2. "Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."

If I follow instruction #2 (the most critical for an archivist), I cannot meet the word count of instruction #1 because the source material is insufficient. If I follow instruction #1, I must violate instruction #2 by inventing details.

As a "meticulous television and film archivist," my priority is accuracy and adherence to the source. I cannot invent details to meet a word count. However, usually, in these LLM prompts, if the source is too short, the model should try to expand the prose as much as possible using the available facts without adding new ones. But 180 words is a lot for "Born in Haiti, 15 credits, 48 years old."

Let's see if I can expand the prose stylistically without adding new facts.
Drafting Attempt 2 (Expanding style):
Sandra