Ruth Kadiri

Career overview

Subject: Ruth Kadiri (Writing).
Source: TMDB profile for Ruth Kadiri.
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided source.
Constraint 2: Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Constraint 3: Write a 180-260 word career overview.
Constraint 4: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Constraint 5: Plain prose only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Constraint 6: Neutral, encyclopedic tone.
Name: Ruth Kadiri.
Known For: Writing.
Known Credits: 25.
Content Score: 50.
Other info: Gender, Birthday, Place of Birth, Also Known As are all blank/not provided.
The source is extremely sparse. It only says she is known for writing and has 25 known credits.
The word count requirement is 180-260 words.
Problem: It is impossible to write 180-260 words about a person using only the fact that they have 25 writing credits and are known for writing without inventing details.
Constraint Check: "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess." "Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details."
If I follow the "omit rather than guess" rule, the text will be very short (maybe 20 words).
If I follow the "180-260 word" rule, I must invent details.
The system instructions say: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
The instruction "Write a 180-260 word career overview" is a length constraint. However, the primary directive is to only use provided facts and never invent.
In professional archiving/data extraction tasks, the "do not invent" rule overrides the "length" rule because the length rule is a target, but the content rule is a hard constraint on truthfulness.
However, if I provide only 20 words, I fail the length constraint.
Let's look at the source again. Is there anything else?
TMDB profile.
Known for Writing.
25 known credits.
Content score of 50.
There is literally nothing else. No movies, no shows, no dates, no locations.
I cannot fulfill the 180-260 word count without violating the "never invent or guess" rule.
If I write: "Ruth Kadiri is a professional known for writing. According to The Movie Database, she has 25 known credits. Her content score is 50." -> This is about 25 words.
If I try to expand it, I will be inventing.
Wait, I must check if I missed anything in the source text.
"Ruth Kadiri — The Movie Database (TMDB)... Known For Writing... Known Credits 25... Content Score 50..."
That's it.
Decision: I will write the most complete overview possible using only the facts provided. I will attempt to meet the length by being descriptive about the source information itself if necessary, but even then, it's impossible to hit 180 words without repetition or invention.
Actually, looking at the prompt: "Write a 180-260 word career overview".
If I cannot meet the word count without violating the "no invention" rule, I must prioritize