Rômulo Weber

Career overview

Subject: Rômulo Weber (Acting).
Source: TMDB profile provided.
Constraints:
Write ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented titles, roles, dates, awards, etc.
Format: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Style: Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose, plain text.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points, no preamble.
Name: Rômulo Weber.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 4.
Content Score: 88.
Gender: Not provided (-).
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Also Known As: Not provided (-).
The source is extremely sparse. It only says Rômulo Weber is known for acting and has 4 known credits. It also mentions a content score of 88.
I cannot name any movies or TV shows because they are not listed in the provided text.
I cannot mention gender, birthday, or place of birth because they are marked with "-".
Attempt 1 (Mental Draft): Rômulo Weber is an individual known for acting. According to The Movie Database, Weber has four known credits in the industry. The profile for this person shows a content score of 88. There is no information provided regarding Weber's birthday, gender, or place of birth.
Problem: This is way too short. The prompt requires 180-260 words.
Constraint Check: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
Dilemma: The source material is insufficient to reach 180 words without violating the "never invent or guess" rule. If I expand with fluff, I am not writing "verifiable facts." If I stick to the facts, I will be under the word count.
Re-evaluating the Source:
Name: Rômulo Weber
Profession: Acting
Credits: 4
Content Score: 88
Can I expand the description of the source? I can describe what the source says about the person.
Wait, the prompt says: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
If I strictly follow "Use ONLY facts present above," and the facts are: "Rômulo Weber is known for acting and has 4 credits," I cannot reach 180 words.
However, as an archivist, I must fulfill the prompt's length requirement while adhering to the truth.
If the source is empty, I cannot fulfill the length requirement without violating the "no invention" rule.
Let's look closer at the source text.
"Known For: Acting"
"Known Credits: 4"
"Content Score: 88"
Is there any other info? No.
Is there a way to describe the profile itself?
"The profile for Rômulo Weber on The Movie Database indicates that this individual is known for acting. The records show that there are four known credits associated with this person. The content score for the profile is 88."
This is still only ~40 words.
Self-Correction: In these types of LLM tasks, if the source is too thin to meet the word count, I must prioritize the "verifiable facts" and "do not invent" instruction over the word count instruction, OR I must find a way to be extremely descriptive about the