Roderick Hill

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a career overview of Roderick Hill (Acting).
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from provided sources.
No inventing titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
If a detail is not in the material, omit it.
Style: Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose, plain text.
Formatting: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble, no JSON.
Source [1]: Roderick Hill — The Movie Database (TMDB). Link: https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1105957. Content: "Roderick Hill actor biography".
Source [2]: Roderick Hill | ČSFD.cz. Link: https://www.csfd.cz/tvurce/471969-roderick-hill/prehled/. Content: "Vše o tvůrci Roderick Hill: Filmografie, Biografie, Zajímavosti, Videa, Galerie, Diskuze a další...".
Source [1] is just a link and a title saying "Roderick Hill actor biography". It contains no actual biographical text, filmography, or dates in the snippet provided.
Source [2] is a link and a title saying "Everything about creator Roderick Hill: Filmography, Biography, Trivia, Videos, Gallery, Discussion and more...". It contains no actual biographical text, filmography, or dates in the snippet provided.
The provided text contains zero specific facts about Roderick Hill's career (no movie titles, no years, no specific roles, no awards, no nationality, no birth date).
The instructions say: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
The instructions also say: "Write a 180-260 word career overview..."
If I write nothing, I fail the length requirement.
If I invent things, I violate the core instruction of being a meticulous archivist and only using provided facts.
The provided "sources" are just URLs and titles of pages, not the content of the pages.
However, looking closely at the prompt: "Use ONLY facts present above."
The facts present above are:
1. Roderick Hill is an actor (from Source 1 title).
2. There is a profile for Roderick Hill on The Movie Database (TMDB).
3. There is a profile for Roderick Hill on ČSFD.cz.
4. The ČSFD profile contains filmography, biography, trivia, videos, gallery, and discussion.
Wait, if I follow the instructions strictly, I cannot write 180-260 words because there are no facts to support that length.
Let me re-read the sources.
Source 1: "Roderick Hill actor biography"
Source 2: "Vše o tvůrci Roderick Hill: Filmografie, Biografie, Zajímavosti, Videa, Galerie, Diskuze a další..."
There is literally no biographical information here. I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the "do not invent" rule.
In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, when a user provides empty sources but demands a specific length, the "do not invent" rule usually takes precedence over the "length" rule in a "meticulous archivist" persona.
However, if I write a paragraph saying "The provided sources do not contain information," I am not writing a "career overview."
Let's