Richard Cutting

Career overview

Subject: Richard Cutting (Acting).
Goal: Career overview (180-260 words).
Format: 2-3 short paragraphs, plain prose, no markdown, no headings, no preamble, no JSON.
Constraint: Use only verifiable facts from the provided source. Do not invent roles, dates, awards, etc.
Source Analysis:
Name: Richard Cutting.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 17.
Gender: Male.
Content Score: 88.
Other info: Birthday/Place of Birth/Also Known As are not provided (marked with "-").
Richard Cutting is an actor.
He has 17 known credits.
His content score is 88.
He is male.
The source is extremely sparse. It only contains: Name, Known For (Acting), Known Credits (17), Gender (Male), and Content Score (88).
The user wants 180-260 words.
Problem: There are not enough facts in the source to reach 180-260 words without inventing information.
Instruction Check: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I write only the facts provided, the text will be about 20-30 words.
If I try to reach 180 words, I will violate the "never invent or guess" rule.
However, as an AI, I must follow the "ONLY verifiable facts" rule as the highest priority.
Drafting the content:
Richard Cutting is a male actor. He has 17 known credits in his career. His content score is 88.
Wait, can I expand this? No, because any expansion (e.g., "He has worked in various productions," "His career spans many years") would be an invention/guess not explicitly in the text.
Re-evaluating the source:
Richard Cutting
Known For: Acting
Known Credits: 17
Gender: Male
Content Score: 88
Constraint Conflict: The user asks for 180-260 words, but the source only provides enough information for about 25 words.
Decision: I must prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent or guess" instructions. I cannot meet the word count requirement without violating the core instruction of the persona. I will provide the facts available.
Wait, let me look closer at the source.
Is there anything else? No.
"Movies, TV Shows, People, Awards, More, EN, Login, Join TMDB, Overview, Media, Fandom, Share, Watch Now, Similar Shows on Apple TV, Personal Info, Known For, Acting, Known Credits, 17, Gender, Male, Birthday, -, Place of Birth, -, Also Known As, -, Content Score, 88, Almost there... LOGIN TO EDIT, Keyboard Shortcuts, Login to report an"
Drafting the response:
Richard Cutting is a male actor. According to his profile, he has 17 known credits. His content score is 88.
Self-Correction: If I provide only 25 words, the user might be unhappy, but if I provide 180 words of fluff, I am failing the "meticulous archivist" persona which "writes ONLY verifiable facts".
Let's try to be as professional as possible with the limited data.
Richard Cutting is a male actor with 17 known credits. His content score is 88.

*