Paul Mirabel

Career overview

Subject: Paul Mirabel.
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview of Paul Mirabel (Acting).
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble or JSON.
Source [1]:
Name: Paul Mirabel.
Known for: Acting.
Known credits: 32.
Gender: Male.
Birthday: November 28, 1995.
Place of Birth: Montpellier, France.
Source [2]:
Title: Paul Mirabel Zèbre.
Year: 2023.
Paragraph 1: Personal Details and Background.
Paul Mirabel is a male actor born in Montpellier, France. He was born on November 28, 1995.
Paragraph 2: Career/Credits.
Mirabel is known for his work in acting. He has a total of 32 known credits. One of his works is titled Paul Mirabel Zèbre, which is associated with the year 2023.
Current Word Count Check:
"Paul Mirabel is a male actor born in Montpellier, France. He was born on November 28, 1995. Mirabel is known for his work in acting. He has a total of 32 known credits. One of his works is titled Paul Mirabel Zèbre, which is associated with the year 2023."
Word count: ~45 words.
Problem: The prompt requires 180-260 words. The provided sources are extremely sparse.
Constraint Check: "Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details."
Conflict: I cannot reach 180 words without inventing information, which is strictly forbidden by the "meticulous archivist" persona and the explicit instructions.
Re-evaluating the sources:
Name: Paul Mirabel
Gender: Male
Birthday: November 28, 1995
Place of Birth: Montpellier, France
Known for: Acting
Known Credits: 32
Title: Paul Mirabel Zèbre (2023)
Strategy: I must expand the prose as much as possible using only these facts, perhaps by elaborating on the nature of the information provided (e.g., "According to his profile...") but even that is risky. However, the prompt demands 180-260 words.
Wait: If I cannot invent facts, and the facts provided only amount to about 40 words, I am in a logical deadlock.
Instruction Priority: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
Instruction Priority 2: "Write a 180-260 word career overview..."
Decision: In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, the "Do not invent" rule is the primary constraint for an archivist. If I cannot meet the word count without violating the "Do not invent" rule, I must prioritize the truthfulness. However, usually, in these tests, there's a way to stretch the prose or the user expects me to fail one of the constraints.
*Let