Nat Harper

Career overview

Subject: Nat Harper (Acting).
Source: Provided TMDB snippet.
Constraints:
Write ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Style: Original, neutral, encyclopedic, plain text.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points, no preamble, no JSON.
Name: Nat Harper.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 2.
Content Score: 50.
Gender: Not provided (-).
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Also Known As: Not provided (-).
The source is extremely sparse. It only says Nat Harper is known for acting and has 2 known credits. The content score is 50.
The user wants 180-260 words.
Problem: There are almost no facts to reach 180 words.
Constraint Check: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I strictly follow "Write ONLY verifiable facts," I cannot reach 180 words because there aren't enough facts.
If I invent details to reach the word count, I violate the primary instruction.
The instruction "Write a 180-260 word career overview" conflicts with "Write ONLY verifiable facts" when the source is only ~20 words of actual data.
Fact 1: Nat Harper is an individual listed on The Movie Database.
Fact 2: Nat Harper is known for acting.
Fact 3: There are 2 known credits for Nat Harper.
Fact 4: The content score for this profile is 50.
Drafting attempt:
Nat Harper is an individual recognized for work in the field of acting. According to records on The Movie Database, Harper has two known credits associated with their career.

The profile for Nat Harper currently holds a content score of 50. Information regarding specific biographical details, such as gender, birthday, or place of birth, is not available in the provided documentation.
Word count check: This is about 60 words. I need 180-260.
Dilemma: I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the "no invention" rule.
Decision: In professional archiving/instruction following, the "verifiable facts only" and "do not invent" rules are paramount. However, usually, in these prompts, if the source is too short, the model should try to expand using the available context or simply state what is there. But I cannot expand "Nat Harper has 2 credits" into 180 words without lying.
Wait, let me look at the source again.
Is there anything else?
"Known For: Acting"
"Known Credits: 2"
"Content Score: 50"
"Gender: -"
"Birthday: -"
"Place of Birth: -"
There is literally nothing else. I will write as much as I can using the facts provided, but I cannot reach 180 words without violating the core directive of "never invent or guess."
Wait, looking at the prompt again: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
This is a "trap" prompt or a poorly constructed one where the constraints are mutually exclusive.
If I write 180