Nasri Thompson

Career overview

Subject: Nasri Thompson (Acting).
Source: Provided TMDB snippet.
Constraints:
Write ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No inventions (titles, roles, dates, awards, etc.).
Format: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Style: Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose, plain text.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points, no preamble, no JSON.
Name: Nasri Thompson.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 4.
Content Score: 50.
Gender: Not provided (-).
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Also Known As: Not provided (-).
The source is extremely sparse. It only mentions the name, that they are known for acting, and have 4 known credits.
The word count requirement is 180-260 words.
Problem: It is impossible to write 180-260 words of "verifiable facts" when the source only provides about 10 words of actual information.
Constraint Check: "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess." and "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
If I write 180 words, I will be inventing information (hallucinating), which is strictly forbidden by the prompt.
If I write only the facts, I will be well under the word count.
The prompt says: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
This is a logical contradiction if the source is too short.
However, as an archivist, I must prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent" instructions over the word count instruction, because the word count instruction is a length target, while the "never invent" instruction is a factual integrity constraint.
Actually, looking at the source again:
Name: Nasri Thompson.
Profession: Acting.
Credits: 4.
Content Score: 50.
Let's see if I can expand the prose without inventing facts.
"Nasri Thompson is an individual recognized for work in the field of acting. According to records from The Movie Database, Thompson has a total of four known credits. The content score associated with this profile is 50."
That's about 35 words. I cannot reach 180 words without inventing details like specific movie titles, years, or genres, which are explicitly forbidden.
Wait, let me re-read the source carefully.
"Known For: Acting"
"Known Credits: 4"
"Content Score: 50"
"Nasri Thompson — The Movie Database (TMDB)"
If I follow the instruction "Write a 180-260 word career overview", but also "Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details," I am stuck.
In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, the "Negative Constraint" (Do not invent) usually overrides the "Length Constraint" (180-260 words) when they conflict, because the length constraint is a goal for the content, but the content itself is restricted to a very small set of facts.
Let's try to be as descriptive as possible with the existing facts.
"Nasri Thompson is an actor whose professional profile is documented on The Movie Database. The individual is primarily known for work in acting. Within the database, Thompson is credited with