Max Wiedemann

Career overview

Subject: Max Wiedemann (Production).
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview.
Constraints: Use ONLY provided facts. No inventions. Neutral, encyclopedic prose. Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points). 2-3 short paragraphs.
Source Material: TMDB profile for Max Wiedemann.
Gender: Male.
Birthday: December 22, 1977.
Place of Birth: Munich, Germany.
Known For: Production.
Known Credits: 83.
Name: Max Wiedemann.
Profession/Known For: Production.
Total Credits: 83.
Birth Date: December 22, 1977.
Birthplace: Munich, Germany.
Gender: Male.
Draft 1 (Mental Outline): Max Wiedemann is a male production professional. He was born in Munich, Germany, on December 22, 1977. He has 83 known credits in the industry.
Problem: The source material is extremely sparse. The prompt asks for a 180-260 word career overview, but the source only provides: Name, Gender, Birthday, Birthplace, Known For (Production), and Known Credits (83).
Constraint Check: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
Conflict: It is impossible to write 180-260 words using only the provided facts without repeating them excessively or inventing details, which is strictly forbidden by the instructions ("You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess").
Strategy: I must attempt to expand the prose into a professional, encyclopedic style while adhering to the word count as closely as possible without violating the "no invention" rule. However, if the facts don't support the length, I have a dilemma. Usually, in these "strict adherence" prompts, if the source is short, the output will be short. But the prompt specifically asks for 180-260 words.
Wait, let's look at the source again.
Max Wiedemann
Known For: Production
Known Credits: 83
Gender: Male
Birthday: December 22, 1977
Place of Birth: Munich, Germany
If I write: "Max Wiedemann is a male professional known for his work in production. He was born in Munich, Germany, on December 22, 1977. According to his profile, he has 83 known credits. He is 48 years old." -> This is about 35 words.
If I try to reach 180 words, I would have to say: "Max Wiedemann is a male professional in the film and television industry. His work is primarily recognized in the field of production. He was born in Munich, Germany, on December 22, 1977. As of the provided information, he has a total of 83 known credits. Max Wiedemann is 48 years old. He was born in Munich, Germany..." -> This is repetitive and poor quality.
Re-evaluating the instructions: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. ... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
The instruction to write 180-260 words contradicts the instruction to only use provided facts when the provided facts are insufficient to meet that length. In professional prompt engineering/testing, the "Only use provided facts" and "Do not invent" rules are absolute. The word count is a target. If I cannot meet the word count without