Mauricio Figueroa

Career overview

Subject: Mauricio Figueroa (Acting).
Goal: 180-260 word career overview.
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided source.
Constraint 2: No invented details (titles, roles, dates, awards, etc.).
Constraint 3: Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Constraint 4: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Constraint 5: Neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Name: Mauricio Figueroa.
Also Known As: Mauricio Figueroa Restrepo.
Gender: Male.
Birthday: December 12, 1949.
Age: 76 years old.
Place of Birth: Medellín, Colombia.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 7.
Source: The Movie Database (TMDB).
The source is extremely sparse. It lists his name, birthday, place of birth, gender, and that he is known for acting with 7 known credits.
It does not list specific movie titles, TV show titles, specific roles, awards, or specific years of work (other than his birth year).
Challenge: Writing 180-260 words using only these facts is nearly impossible without repetition or fluff, which violates the "verifiable facts" and "encyclopedic prose" instruction. However, I must try to meet the word count while adhering to the "only verifiable facts" rule.

Wait, if I only have these facts, I cannot reach 180 words without being extremely repetitive or adding non-verifiable information. Let's look at the facts again.
Name: Mauricio Figueroa
Also known as: Mauricio Figueroa Restrepo
Birth date: December 12, 1949
Birth place: Medellín, Colombia
Gender: Male
Profession: Acting
Credits: 7

If I write: "Mauricio Figueroa is an actor. He was born on December 12, 1949, in Medellín, Colombia. He is also known as Mauricio Figueroa Restrepo. He has 7 known credits in acting." -> This is about 35 words.

The prompt asks for 180-260 words. If the source doesn't have enough information to reach that length without inventing things, I have a conflict.
Constraint Check: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."

If I omit everything not in the source, I cannot reach 180 words. If I reach 180 words, I must invent something.
The instruction "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess" is the primary directive for an archivist.
However, the user also specifies a word count.

Let's see if I can expand the existing facts into a formal prose style.
"Mauricio Figueroa is a male actor whose professional work is documented in The Movie Database. He was born in Medellín, Colombia, on December 12, 1949. He is also identified by the name Mauricio Figueroa Restrepo. According to his profile, he has seven known credits in the field of acting."

This is still very short. Let me re-read the source. Is there anything else?
Content Score: 88 (not really a career fact)
Known For: Acting
Known Credits: 7

There is literally no other information. I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent" rules.

Decision: I will prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent" instructions. In professional archiving, accuracy is paramount over word count. However