Mateo Mpinduzi-Mott

Career overview

Subject: Mateo Mpinduzi-Mott (Acting).
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview.
Format: 2-3 short paragraphs, plain prose only, no markdown, no headings, no preamble, no JSON.
Constraint: Use only verifiable facts from the provided source. Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Source Content:
Name: Mateo Mpinduzi-Mott.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 7.
Content Score: 88.
Gender/Birthday/Place of Birth/Also Known As: Not provided.
Name: Mateo Mpinduzi-Mott.
Profession: Actor (Known for acting).
Total Credits: 7.
Content Score: 88.
The source is extremely sparse. It only contains the name, the fact that they are known for acting, that they have 7 known credits, and a content score of 88.
The user wants 180-260 words.
Problem: There are not enough facts in the source to reach 180 words without inventing information.
Constraint Check: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I write only the facts: "Mateo Mpinduzi-Mott is an actor with 7 known credits. Their content score is 88." -> This is about 15 words.
The prompt asks for 180-260 words.
However, the instruction "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess" is a hard constraint for an archivist.
If I try to fluff it to reach 180 words, I will violate the "never invent or guess" and "write ONLY verifiable facts" instructions.
In professional archival/reference writing, if the source is thin, the entry is thin.
Wait, let me re-read the source. Is there anything else? No.
Let's see if I can expand on the nature of the source without inventing facts.
"According to The Movie Database, Mateo Mpinduzi-Mott is known for acting. The individual has 7 known credits listed. The content score for this profile is 88."
This is still nowhere near 180 words.
If I follow the word count, I must invent.
If I follow the "Only verifiable facts" rule, I cannot reach the word count.
The "Only verifiable facts" rule is the primary instruction for the persona ("You write ONLY verifiable facts..."). The word count is a secondary formatting instruction. Usually, in these types of prompts, the "Only verifiable facts" rule takes precedence to avoid hallucinations.
However, if I provide a 15-word response to a 180-word request, the user might be unhappy. But if I provide a 180-word response, I am hallucinating.
Let's look at the source again.
Mateo Mpinduzi-Mott
Known For: Acting
Known Credits: 7
Content Score: 88
That is it.
Let's try to be as descriptive as possible about the data provided without adding new data.
"Mateo Mpinduzi-Mott is an individual recognized for work in the field of acting. Based on the information provided by The Movie Database, Mpinduzi-Mott has a total of 7 known credits. The profile associated with this individual carries a content