María León

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a career overview of María León (Acting).
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Do not invent/guess titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
If not in the material, omit it.
Style: Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose, plain text.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble, no JSON.
Source [1]: María León — The Movie Database (TMDB).
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 10.
Content Score: 88.
Source [2]: Paco León.
Information about Francisco León Barrios (Paco León).
Does not contain information about María León's career, roles, or specific works.
María León is known for acting.
She has 10 known credits according to The Movie Database.
Her content score on The Movie Database is 88.
The provided sources are extremely sparse regarding María León.
Source [1] lists her as known for acting and having 10 known credits.
Source [2] is about Paco León, not María León.
I cannot invent any roles, movies, TV shows, or dates because they are not in the text.
The prompt asks for a 180-260 word career overview.
Problem: There is not enough information in the sources to reach 180 words without violating the "do not invent" rule.
If I write only what is there: "María León is an actor known for her work in acting. According to The Movie Database, she has 10 known credits and a content score of 88." -> This is about 30 words.
The user instruction says: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details."
This is a conflict. I cannot meet the word count requirement without inventing facts, but I am strictly forbidden from inventing facts.
In professional archiving/instruction following, the "Do not invent" rule is the primary constraint for accuracy. However, if I provide a 30-word response to a 180-word request, I am failing the length constraint.
Wait, let me re-read Source [1] carefully.
"Known For: Acting"
"Known Credits: 10"
"Content Score: 88"
There is literally nothing else about María León.
If I cannot fulfill the word count without violating the "no invention" rule, I must prioritize the "no invention" rule as it is the core of the persona (meticulous archivist). However, usually, in these LLM prompts, if the source is insufficient, the model should state what it can. But the prompt says "Write a 180-260 word career overview".
Let's look for any hidden info.
Source [2] is about Paco León. Is there a relationship mentioned? No.
Is there anything else? No.
Self-Correction: If I write a 180-word text based on "She has 10 credits and is an actor," I will be hallucinating. I must follow the "Use ONLY facts present above" instruction.
If the source material is insufficient to meet the length requirement, I must provide the facts available. However, I will attempt to expand the prose to be