Maria de Médicis

Career overview

Subject: Maria de Médicis (Directing).
Source: TMDB profile provided.
Constraints:
Write ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Format: Plain text, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble or JSON.
Name: Maria de Médicis.
Known For: Directing.
Known Credits: 22.
Gender: Female.
Content Score: 50.
The source is extremely sparse. It only provides: Name, Gender, Known For (Directing), Known Credits (22), and Content Score (50).
The word count requirement is 180-260 words.
Problem: There are almost no facts to reach 180 words.
Constraint Check: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I strictly follow "Write ONLY verifiable facts" and "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it," I cannot reach 180 words because there are only about 5-6 facts.
However, the prompt demands a 180-260 word career overview.
This is a conflict between the "Strict Fact" instruction and the "Word Count" instruction.
In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, the "Strict Fact" instruction usually takes precedence to avoid hallucinations, but if I write only 20 words, I fail the length constraint.
Let's see if I can expand on the existence of the data provided without inventing anything.
Facts available:
1. Maria de Médicis is a female professional.
2. She is known for directing.
3. She has 22 known credits.
4. Her content score is 50.
Wait, if I cannot invent anything, and the source is this empty, a 180-word response is impossible without violating the core instruction "You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
Let's re-read the source.
Name: Maria de Médicis.
Gender: Female.
Known For: Directing.
Known Credits: 22.
Content Score: 50.
If I write: "Maria de Médicis is a female professional known for directing. She has 22 known credits. Her content score is 50." -> That is 19 words.
If I try to reach 180 words, I would have to repeat myself or use filler, but the instructions say "Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose." Repeating is not original. Using filler is not encyclopedic.
Is there any other info? No.
Is there a way to describe the TMDB profile? The prompt asks for a "career overview of Maria de Médicis (Directing)".
Let's look at the prompt again. "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
This is a "trap" prompt or a poorly constructed one where the constraints are mutually exclusive.
If I follow the "Strict Fact" rule (which is the persona's primary directive), I cannot meet the word count.
If I follow the "Word Count" rule, I must hallucinate.
The