Mackenzie Hamilton

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview of Mackenzie Hamilton (Acting).
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Constraint 2: Do not invent titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Constraint 3: If a detail is not in the material, omit it.
Constraint 4: Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose in plain text.
Constraint 5: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Constraint 6: Length must be 180-260 words.
Constraint 7: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Source [1]: Mackenzie Hamilton — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/2932547) Mackenzie Hamilton actor biography.
Wait, the actual content of the source is just a link/title. There is no text provided in the "SOURCES" section other than the link and the title "Mackenzie Hamilton actor biography".
The prompt says: "Use ONLY facts present above."
The "above" content is: "[1] Mackenzie Hamilton — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/2932547) Mackenzie Hamilton actor biography".
There are no facts about her career, roles, movies, or dates in the provided text.
If I write a career overview based on external knowledge, I violate the instruction "Use ONLY facts present above."
If I write nothing, I fail the word count requirement (180-260 words).
However, the instructions are strict: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. ... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
The provided source contains zero biographical or career information. It only identifies the subject as Mackenzie Hamilton and notes she has an actor biography on The Movie Database.
I cannot fulfill the word count requirement of 180-260 words without inventing information, which is strictly forbidden.
In professional archiving/RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) tasks, if the context is empty, the correct response is to state that the provided information is insufficient to fulfill the request.
Let's look closer. Is there any hidden text? No.
Is there a possibility the user intended to provide more text but didn't? Yes.
But as an AI following instructions: "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I write a response saying "The provided source does not contain information about Mackenzie Hamilton's career," it will be very short and fail the word count.
However, if I follow the "omit rather than guess" rule, I cannot write a 180-260 word overview because there are no facts to write about.
Wait, let me re-read the prompt. "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
Since there are no facts present above regarding her career, I cannot write the overview.
Self-Correction: Sometimes in these tests, the "Source" is just a placeholder. But I must act as the archivist. An archivist cannot write a biography if the file is empty.
Let's try to see if I can find any fact.
Fact 1: The subject is Mackenzie Hamilton.
Fact 2: There is a biography for Mackenzie Hamilton on The Movie Database (TMDB).
That's it.
If I write: "The provided documentation for Mackenzie Hamilton is limited to a reference