Lord Montagu of Beaulieu

Career overview

Subject: Lord Montagu of Beaulieu (Acting).
Goal: Write a 180-260 word career overview.
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided sources.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble or JSON.
Source [1]: Lord Montagu of Beaulieu is known for acting. He has 4 known credits. Content score is 50.
Source [2]: Lord Montagu (2013) is a title.
Source [3]: Lord Montagu (2013) is a title.
Name: Lord Montagu of Beaulieu.
Profession: Acting.
Known Credits: 4.
Specific Work: Lord Montagu (2013).
The sources are extremely sparse.
Source [1] says he is known for acting and has 4 known credits.
Source [2] and [3] mention a production titled Lord Montagu released in 2013.
I cannot invent details about what the movies are about, who he played, or what other movies he was in, because the sources don't list them.
The prompt asks for a 180-260 word career overview.
Problem: There is almost no information to reach 180 words without violating the "Do not invent" rule.
Self-Correction/Constraint Check: If I write only what is there, I will have about 30 words.
"Lord Montagu of Beaulieu is an individual known for work in the field of acting. According to available records, he has four known credits to his name. One of these credits is the production titled Lord Montagu, which was released in 2013."
This is nowhere near 180 words.
If I expand it to meet the word count, I will be inventing facts (e.g., "He has appeared in various productions," "His career includes...").
The instructions say: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
The instructions also say: "Write a 180-260 word career overview".
Conflict: The word count requirement (180-260) conflicts with the "Only verifiable facts" requirement because the facts provided are insufficient to reach that length.
In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, the "Do not invent" and "Use ONLY facts" rules are usually the primary constraints for an archivist persona. However, if I fail the word count, I fail the prompt.
Let's look closer at the sources.
Source 1: "Known For: Acting", "Known Credits: 4", "Content Score: 50".
Source 2/3: "Lord Montagu (2013)".
There is literally nothing else.
Strategy: I must attempt to be as descriptive as possible using the provided data points without adding external info. But I cannot reach 180 words.
Wait, if I repeat the facts in different ways, is that "inventing"? No, but it's poor writing.
If I say "The actor Lord Montagu of Beaulieu has a career recognized for acting," I am just rephrasing.
Let