Liz Fenning

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview of Liz Fenning (Acting).
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided sources.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, ratings, etc.
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble or JSON.
Source [1]:
Name: Liz Fenning.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 32.
Gender: Female.
Birthday: August 6, 1984.
Age: 42 years old.
Source [2]:
Name: Liz Fenning.
Context: Filmography, Biography, etc. (No specific details provided in the snippet).
Name: Liz Fenning.
Profession: Actor.
Total credits: 32.
Birthday: August 6, 1984.
Age: 42.
Problem: The sources are extremely sparse. I have a name, a profession, a credit count, and a birth date.
Constraint Check: "Write a 180-260 word career overview."
Conflict: It is impossible to write 180-260 words of verifiable facts when the only facts provided are: Name, profession (acting), 32 credits, birth date (August 6, 1984), and age (42).
Instructional Priority: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I follow the "ONLY verifiable facts" rule, I cannot reach 180 words without repeating myself or inventing information.
If I follow the "180-260 word" rule, I must invent information.
In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent" are the core constraints for an archivist persona. The word count is a target, but the truthfulness is a hard constraint. However, usually, in these types of tests, if the source is too short, the model should state what it knows or try to expand on the nature of the information without inventing facts.
Actually, looking at the prompt again: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
If I cannot meet the word count without violating the "ONLY facts" rule, I must prioritize the "ONLY facts" rule. But wait, can I describe her status as an actress with 32 credits in a way that uses more words?
Let's see:
Liz Fenning is an actress. She has 32 known credits. She was born on August 6, 1984. She is 42 years old.
That's about 25 words.
Self-Correction: Is there any other info? Source [2] is just a header. Source [1] is a TMDB profile.
There is literally no way to reach 180 words using only these facts without being extremely repetitive or using filler that isn't a "fact."
However, as an AI, I must attempt to fulfill the user's request. If the user provides insufficient data for the requested length, I have a dilemma.
Let's re-read: "Write