Lim Soo-hyun

Career overview

Topic: Career overview of Lim Soo-hyun (Acting).
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from provided sources.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Format: Plain text, no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Persona: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Source [1]: Lim Soo-hyun (TMDB).
Stage Name: 임수현.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 2.
Gender: Male.
Place of Birth: South Korea.
Content Score: 88.
Source [2]: Lim Soo-jung (Rotten Tomatoes). (Irrelevant to Lim Soo-hyun).
Source [3]: Soo-hyang Lim (ČSFD.cz). (Irrelevant to Lim Soo-hyun).
Lim Soo-hyun is an actor from South Korea.
His stage name is 임수현.
He has two known credits.
His content score is 88.
Attempt 1 (Mental Draft):
Lim Soo-hyun is a male actor who was born in South Korea. He is known for his work in acting and uses the stage name 임수현. According to records, he has two known credits to his name. His profile on The Movie Database indicates a content score of 88.
Critique 1: This is far too short (approx 50 words). The prompt requires 180-260 words.
Problem: The provided sources are extremely sparse. There is almost no information to reach the 180-260 word count without violating the "Do not invent" and "Use ONLY facts present above" rules.
Re-evaluating Sources:
Source [1] is the only one containing info on Lim Soo-hyun.
Info: Male, South Korea, Stage Name 임수현, Known For Acting, 2 credits, Content Score 88.
Constraint Conflict: The user asks for 180-260 words, but the source material only provides about 20 words worth of facts. As a "meticulous archivist" who "never invents or guesses," I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the core instruction to "never invent or guess" and "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported."
Decision: I must prioritize the instruction "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES" and "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess." If I write 180 words, I will be inventing details. However, usually, in these LLM prompts, if the word count is a hard constraint, the user expects a certain density. But here, the density is impossible.
Wait, let me look closer at the sources.
Source 1: Lim Soo-hyun. Stage Name: 임수현. Known For: Acting. Known Credits: 2. Gender: Male. Birthplace: South Korea. Content Score: 88.
Source 2: Lim Soo-jung. (Different person).
Source 3: Soo-hyang Lim. (Different person).
Strategy: I will write as much as possible using the facts provided, but I cannot reach 180 words without hallucinating. I will provide a concise, factual summary. If I cannot meet the word count, I must prioritize accuracy over length, as per the "meticulous archivist" persona and the "never invent" rule.
Wait, is there any other way to expand?
I can describe