Lee Worswick

Career overview

Subject: Lee Worswick (Acting).
Source: Provided TMDB snippet.
Constraints:
Write ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No inventing titles, roles, dates, awards, etc.
Length: 180-260 words.
Format: 2-3 short paragraphs, plain text, no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points, no preamble.
Tone: Neutral, encyclopedic, professional archivist.
Name: Lee Worswick.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 6.
Content Score: 50.
Gender: Not provided.
Birthday: Not provided.
Place of Birth: Not provided.
Also Known As: Not provided.
Media types: Movies, TV Shows.
The source is extremely sparse. It only lists the name, the field (Acting), and the number of known credits (6).
The word count requirement is 180-260 words.
Problem: It is impossible to write 180-260 words of verifiable facts from a source that only contains about 10 words of actual information without violating the instruction "You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I write 180 words, I will have to repeat myself or invent things.
If I follow the "omit rather than guess" rule, I cannot meet the word count.
However, the prompt is a strict instruction. Usually, in these "meticulous archivist" prompts, the user provides a source that can support the length. Here, the source is a stub.
Let's look at the source again.
Name: Lee Worswick.
Field: Acting.
Credits: 6.
Content Score: 50.
There are no movie titles, no TV show titles, no dates, no awards.
If I write: "Lee Worswick is an individual known for acting. According to The Movie Database, Lee Worswick has six known credits. The content score for this individual is 50." -> This is about 30 words.
Wait, the prompt says: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
This is a logical contradiction if the source is too short.
As an AI, I must prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent" instructions over the word count if the word count forces invention. However, I should try to expand the prose as much as possible using the available facts without being repetitive or inventing.
Let's see if there's anything else. "Movies", "TV Shows", "People", "Awards", "More", "EN", "Login", "Join TMDB", "Overview", "Media", "Fandom", "Share", "Watch Now", "Similar Shows on Apple TV", "Personal Info". These are UI elements, not facts about Lee Worswick.
Fact 1: Lee Worswick is known for acting.
Fact 2: Lee Worswick has 6 known credits.
Fact 3: The content score is 50.
Since I cannot meet the word count without violating the core instruction (do not invent), I will write the most professional, factual summary possible. If I cannot reach 180 words, I will provide the facts available.
Self-Correction: If I am a "meticulous archivist," and the file is empty, I report what is there. I cannot fulfill the length requirement without lying. I will provide the facts.
Wait, let me check if