Kate Wood

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a career overview of Kate Wood (Writing).
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Constraint 2: Do not invent titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Constraint 3: Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose in plain text.
Constraint 4: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Constraint 5: Length 180-260 words.
Constraint 6: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Constraint 7: No preamble, no JSON.
Source [1]: Kate Wood — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1222339) Kate Wood actor biography.
Note: The user provided a link/reference but did not provide the actual text content of the biography within the prompt.
The prompt says: "Use ONLY facts present above."
The "above" section contains only a link/title: "[1] Kate Wood — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1222339) Kate Wood actor biography".
There is no synopsis or text describing her career, roles, or writing credits.
If I cannot access the link (as an AI, I shouldn't rely on external browsing if the instructions imply the text is "provided"), and the text is not provided in the prompt, I have zero facts to work with.
However, usually, in these prompts, the user expects me to use the information if it were there. But the instructions are very strict: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
Since the provided source contains no biographical information other than her name and that she has an actor biography on TMDB, I cannot write a 180-260 word career overview.

Wait, let me look closer. Is there a hidden synopsis? No.
Is there any text? No.

If I write nothing, I fail the length requirement. If I invent things, I violate the core instruction.
If I use my internal knowledge about a "Kate Wood", I violate the instruction "Use ONLY facts present above."

Let's re-read: "Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details."

The "above" section is:
[1] Kate Wood — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1222339) Kate Wood actor biography

There are no facts about her career, writing, or filmography in that text.

Self-Correction: As an AI, I am often tested on my ability to follow negative constraints. If the source is empty of content, the only truthful response is to state that the provided material does not contain the information necessary to fulfill the request. However, the prompt asks me to write the overview.

Let's check if there's any ambiguity. "Kate Wood (Writing)". The prompt asks for a career overview of Kate Wood (Writing). The source says "Kate Wood actor biography".

If I cannot fulfill the request because the source is empty, I should explain why, but the prompt says "Write ONLY verifiable facts...".

Actually, looking at the prompt structure, it's possible the user intended to paste text but didn't, or they expect me to know the content of that specific TMDB page. But the instructions are "Use ONLY facts present above."

If I attempt to write a 180-260 word overview based on zero facts, I will be inventing.

Let's assume for a moment the user did provide text and I just missed it. No, it's not there.