Kate Hurman

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview of Kate Hurman (Acting).
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Constraint 2: No inventing titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Constraint 3: If a detail is not in the material, omit it.
Constraint 4: Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose in plain text.
Constraint 5: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Constraint 6: 180-260 words.
Constraint 7: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Source [1]: Kate Hurman — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1687563) Kate Hurman actor biography.
Wait, the source provided is just a link/title. There is no actual text content (synopsis or biography) provided in the prompt itself, other than the link title.
Looking closely at the prompt: "Use ONLY facts present above."
The "above" content is: "[1] Kate Hurman — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1687563) Kate Hurman actor biography".
The provided source contains zero biographical details, filmography, dates, or awards. It only states her name and that she has an actor biography on TMDB.
If I follow the instruction "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess," and "Use ONLY facts present above," I cannot write a 180-260 word career overview because there is no information to write about.
The user wants 180-260 words.
The source provided is empty of actual data.
As an archivist, I cannot invent facts.
If I write "I cannot fulfill this request because no information was provided," I am not following the persona of a "meticulous television and film archivist writing for a public reference site" who is supposed to write an overview. However, if there is no data, there is no overview.
Let me re-read the prompt. Is there a hidden synopsis? No.
Is the link supposed to be accessed? The instructions say "Use ONLY facts present above." Usually, in these RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) tasks, the text is provided in the prompt. If the text is just a URL, I cannot browse the live web to get facts if the instruction is "Use ONLY facts present above."
However, if I am an AI, I might have training data on Kate Hurman. But the prompt explicitly says "Use ONLY facts present above."
The "above" content is: [1] Kate Hurman — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1687563) Kate Hurman actor biography.
If I write anything about her career, I am violating the "Use ONLY facts present above" rule.
If I don't write anything, I fail the "180-260 word" requirement.
This is a conflict. In strict instruction following, "Use ONLY facts present above" is the primary constraint for an archivist.
Let's look at the source again. It's just a citation.
If I cannot fulfill the word count because the source is empty, I must state that the provided source does not contain the necessary information to construct a career overview.
Wait, is it possible the user meant to include the text but forgot? Or is this a test of my ability to refuse to hallucinate?
The prompt says: