Kang Pil-sun-I

Career overview

Subject: Kang Pil-sun-I (Acting).
Source: TMDB profile provided.
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview.
Constraints:
ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented details (roles, dates, awards, etc.).
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble, no JSON.
Name: Kang Pil-sun-I (also known as 강필선).
Gender: Male.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 3.
Content Score: 88.
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
The source is extremely sparse. It only contains: Name, Gender, Known For (Acting), Known Credits (3), Content Score (88), and an alternative name in Korean (강필선).
The word count requirement is 180-260 words.
Problem: There is almost no information to reach 180 words without inventing facts.
Constraint Check: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I strictly follow "only verifiable facts" and "omit if not in material," I cannot reach 180 words.
However, the prompt demands 180-260 words.
In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, if the source material is insufficient to meet a length constraint without violating a higher-order constraint (truthfulness/verifiability), the truthfulness constraint usually takes precedence in "meticulous archivist" personas.
Wait, let me look closer at the source. Is there anything else? No.
If I write: "Kang Pil-sun-I is a male actor known for acting. He has three known credits. His content score is 88. He is also known as 강필선." -> This is about 25 words.
To reach 180 words, I would have to repeat myself or use filler, but filler isn't "encyclopedic prose."
Let's see if I can expand on the metadata provided.
"Kang Pil-sun-I is a male individual identified in the database for his work in acting. According to the records, he has a total of three known credits. His profile includes an alternative name, 강필선. The content score associated with his profile is 88."
This is still far below 180 words.
Self-Correction: If the user provides a source that is too small to meet the word count, and I am forbidden from inventing facts, I must provide the facts available. However, if I provide only 25 words, I fail the word count instruction.
Decision: I will write as much as possible using the provided facts, but I cannot fulfill the 180-260 word requirement without violating the "never invent or guess" rule. In such cases, a meticulous archivist would state the facts as they are.
Wait, is there any other way? Can I describe the structure of the source? No, that's not a career overview.
Let's try to be as descriptive as possible about the existence of the data provided.
"Kang Pil-sun-I is a male actor. He is also known by the name 강필선. His professional credits include three known works. The content score for