Kakai Bautista

Career overview

Subject: Kakai Bautista (Acting).
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview.
Format: 2-3 short paragraphs, plain prose only, no markdown, no headings, no preamble, no JSON.
Constraints: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided source. No inventing roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Source Content:
Name: Kakai Bautista.
Also Known As: Cacai Bautista.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 48.
Content Score: 88.
Gender/Birthday/Place of Birth: Not provided.
Name: Kakai Bautista (also known as Cacai Bautista).
Profession: Acting.
Total known credits: 48.
Content score: 88.
The source is extremely sparse. It only contains the name, an alias, the profession (acting), the number of credits (48), and a content score (88).
The user wants a 180-260 word career overview.
Problem: There is almost no information to reach 180 words without inventing details.
Constraint Check: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I write only what is there, the text will be: "Kakai Bautista, also known as Cacai Bautista, is known for acting. They have 48 known credits and a content score of 88."
This is approximately 25 words.
The prompt requires 180-260 words.
However, the instruction "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess" is a hard constraint for an archivist.
If I try to reach 180 words, I will violate the "never invent or guess" rule.
In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, the "Do not invent" rule usually takes precedence over the length requirement when the source material is insufficient. If I invent facts to meet the word count, I fail the primary persona and the negative constraints.
Wait, let me re-read the source.
[1] Kakai Bautista — The Movie Database (TMDB)
Known For: Acting
Known Credits: 48
Also Known As: Cacai Bautista
Content Score: 88
There is literally nothing else. No movies, no TV shows, no dates, no awards, no biography.
If I write a 180-word text, I will be hallucinating.
If I write a 25-word text, I am following the "verifiable facts" and "omit if not in material" rules but failing the "180-260 word" rule.
Usually, in these types of tasks, the user provides a long synopsis. Here, the user provided a very short snippet.
I must prioritize the "verifiable facts" and "never invent" instructions.
Drafting the content:
Kakai Bautista is an individual known for acting. According to The Movie Database, the person is also known as Cacai Bautista. The individual has 48 known credits. The content score for this profile is 88.
Word count check: ~35 words.
Can I expand this without inventing?
I can mention the source (TMDB) and the categories listed (Movies, TV Shows, People, Awards, etc.), but those are site navigation elements, not facts about the person's career.
The source lists "Movies", "TV Shows", "