Jonah Hwang

Career overview

Subject: Jonah Hwang (Acting).
Source: TMDB profile provided.
Constraints:
Write ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Length: 180-260 words.
Format: 2-3 short paragraphs, plain prose only, no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points, no preamble, no JSON.
Tone: Neutral, encyclopedic, archivist style.
Name: Jonah Hwang.
Gender: Male.
Birthday: September 5, 2002.
Age: 24 years old (Note: The source says 24 years old, though mathematically 2002 to 2024/25 might vary, I must stick to what the source says).
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 9.
Content Score: 88.
Draft 1 (Mental Outline): Jonah Hwang is an actor. He was born on September 5, 2002. He is 24 years old. He has 9 known credits in acting. His content score is 88.
Draft 2 (Expanding to meet word count while staying strictly to facts):
Jonah Hwang is an individual identified in the database for his work in acting. According to his profile, he has a total of nine known credits within the industry. His professional profile maintains a content score of 88.

Regarding his personal information, Jonah Hwang is male. He was born on September 5, 2002. The records indicate that he is 24 years old.
Problem: The source is extremely sparse. It is impossible to reach 180-260 words without repeating myself or inventing details, which is strictly forbidden by the prompt ("Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details" and "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess").
Re-evaluating the source:
Name: Jonah Hwang
Gender: Male
Birthday: September 5, 2002
Age: 24 years old
Known For: Acting
Known Credits: 9
Content Score: 88
Constraint Conflict: The user wants 180-260 words, but the source only provides about 30 words worth of unique facts. If I follow the instruction "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES," I cannot reach 180 words without violating the "Do not invent" rule.
Strategy: I will write as much as possible using the available facts in a formal, encyclopedic manner. However, if I cannot reach 180 words without inventing facts, I must prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "Do not invent" instructions over the word count instruction, as the latter is a length constraint while the former is a truth/integrity constraint. Actually, in these types of prompts, usually, the user expects me to expand the prose style to be wordy/formal, but I cannot invent facts.
Let's try to be very formal to stretch the existing facts:
Jonah Hwang is an actor with nine known credits. His professional profile on The Movie Database includes a content score of 88.

Hwang is a male. He was born on September 5, 2002, and is listed as being 24 years old.
Wait, let me look at the source again. Is there anything else?
"Known For: Acting"
"Known Credits: 9"
"Gender: Male"
"Birthday: September 5, 2002"
"Age: 24 years