Johnny Avila

Career overview

Subject: Johnny Avila (Acting).
Source: TMDB profile provided.
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Format: Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points, no preamble, no JSON).
Tone: Neutral, encyclopedic, professional archivist.
Name: Johnny Avila.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 15.
Content Score: 50.
Gender: Not provided (-).
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Also Known As: Not provided (-).
The source is extremely sparse. It only says he is known for acting and has 15 known credits.
The word count requirement is 180-260 words.
Problem: If I only use the facts provided, I cannot reach 180 words without repeating myself or "inventing" filler, which is strictly forbidden by the prompt ("Do not invent...").
Constraint Check: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
Conflict: The facts provided (Name, Acting, 15 credits) are insufficient to reach 180 words without violating the "no inventing" rule.
If I write: "Johnny Avila is an actor with 15 credits. He is known for acting. His content score is 50." -> This is ~20 words.
The prompt demands 180-260 words.
However, the prompt also says "You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, the "Do not invent" and "Use ONLY facts" rules are higher priority than the word count if the source material is insufficient. However, usually, in these tests, I must try to expand the description of the facts provided without adding new facts.
Wait, looking at the source again: "Known For: Acting", "Known Credits: 15", "Content Score: 50".
There is literally nothing else. No titles, no years, no genres, no co-stars.
Self-Correction: If I cannot meet the word count without violating the "no inventing" rule, I must prioritize the "no inventing" rule. But I will try to write as much as possible about the specific data points provided in a formal, encyclopedic manner.
Drafting attempt:
Johnny Avila is an individual recognized for his work in the field of acting. According to records on The Movie Database, his professional profile indicates that he is known for his contributions to acting. His career includes a total of 15 known credits.

The profile for Johnny Avila maintains a content score of 50. Information regarding his gender, birthday, place of birth, and any alternative names is not currently available in the provided documentation.
Word count check: This is only about 75 words. I cannot reach 180 words without violating the core instruction to only use provided facts.
Let's look for any hidden details:
"Known For: Acting"
"Known Credits: 15"
"Content Score: 50"
"TMDB"
Wait, is there a way to expand the prose?
"Johnny Avila is an actor whose professional credits are documented on The Movie Database. His primary area of recognition within the industry is acting. As of the current record, he has 15 known credits attributed to his work