John Verea

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview of John Verea (Acting).
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from provided sources.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Plain text, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Sources:
[1] TMDB: John Verea, Known For: Acting, Known Credits: 25, Gender: Male, Content Score: 88.
[2] ČSFD.cz: Profile for John Verea (Filmography, Biography, etc. mentioned but no specific details provided in text).
[3] Showbiz.CZ: Profile for John Verea (No specific details provided in text).
Name: John Verea.
Profession: Actor (Known for Acting).
Total Known Credits: 25.
Gender: Male.
Content Score (TMDB): 88.
The sources are extremely sparse. They provide the name, the fact that he is an actor, and that he has 25 known credits.
The user wants 180-260 words.
Problem: There is almost no information to reach 180 words without violating the "Do not invent" rule.
Constraint Check: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I write only the facts: "John Verea is a male actor with 25 known credits according to The Movie Database. His content score is 88." -> This is about 20 words.
The prompt asks for 180-260 words.
However, the instructions also say: "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
This creates a conflict: The word count requirement vs. the "only verifiable facts" requirement.
In professional archiving/instruction following, the "Do not invent" and "Use ONLY facts" rules are paramount. If the source material is insufficient to meet the word count, I cannot fulfill the word count without violating the core instruction of not inventing facts.
Let's look at the sources again.
[1] TMDB: John Verea, Acting, 25 credits, Male, Content Score 88.
[2] ČSFD: Just a header saying "Everything about creator John Verea: Filmography, Biography..."
[3] Showbiz.CZ: Just a header saying "Everything you need to know about John Verea".
There is literally nothing else. No movie titles, no years, no specific roles.
If I write a long paragraph, I will be hallucinating.
If I write a short paragraph, I will fail the word count.
Standard instruction hierarchy: "Write ONLY verifiable facts... You never invent... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
This instruction is a "negative constraint" which usually overrides "positive constraints" like word count in high-fidelity extraction tasks.
Wait, can I expand on the existence of the sources?
"John Verea is a male actor whose professional work is documented across various film and television databases. According to The Movie Database, he is known for his work in acting and has a total of 25 known credits listed. His profile on The Movie Database includes a content score of 88. Information regarding