Jeroen Overbeek

Career overview

Subject: Jeroen Overbeek (Acting).
Source provided: A TMDB profile snippet for Jeroen Overbeek.
Constraints:
Write ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble, no JSON.
Name: Jeroen Overbeek.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 5.
Content Score: 88.
Gender: Not provided (-).
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Also Known As: Not provided (-).
The source is extremely sparse. It only lists:
Name: Jeroen Overbeek.
Profession: Acting.
Number of known credits: 5.
Content score: 88.
The prompt asks for a 180-260 word career overview.
Problem: There is not enough information in the source to reach 180 words without violating the "never invent or guess" rule.
If I write only what is there, it will be about 20 words.
If I try to reach 180 words, I will have to repeat myself or invent details, which is strictly forbidden.
"You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
"If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
"Write a 180-260 word career overview..."

Conflict: The source material is insufficient to meet the word count requirement without violating the "no invention" rule.

Decision: As a meticulous archivist, I cannot fulfill the word count requirement if doing so requires lying or guessing. However, usually, in these LLM prompts, if the source is too short, the model should provide as much as possible while adhering to the truth. But the prompt explicitly sets a word count range.

Let's look at the source again.
Jeroen Overbeek is an individual known for acting.
He has 5 known credits.
His content score is 88.

There is literally nothing else. No movie titles, no years, no character names.

If I write: "Jeroen Overbeek is an individual known for his work in acting. According to The Movie Database, he has five known credits. His content score is listed as 88." -> This is ~30 words.

If I try to pad it: "Jeroen Overbeek is an actor. He has 5 credits. His score is 88." -> This is even shorter.

Wait, is there any other info?
"Movies, TV Shows, People, Awards, More, EN, Login, Join TMDB, Overview, Media, Fandom, Share, Watch Now, Similar Shows on Apple TV, Personal Info, Known For, Acting, Known Credits, 5, Gender, Birthday, Place of Birth, Also Known As, Content Score, 88."

There is no way to reach 180 words.

Self-Correction: In strict instruction following, if the source material is insufficient to meet a length constraint without violating a content constraint (do not invent), I must prioritize the content constraint (do not invent/only use provided facts). However, I will try to expand the prose as much as possible using only the provided facts to see if I can get closer, though it's impossible to hit 180 words meaningfully.

Actually, looking at the prompt again: "